Cambridge Civic Journal Forum

May 13, 2024

Betwixt & Between the Budget Hearings – May 13, 2024 Cambridge City Council meeting

Betwixt & Between the Budget Hearings – May 13, 2024 Cambridge City Council meeting

May is the month for money meetings. Last week featured the budget hearings for the departments under the categories of General Government & Public Safety (May 7) as well as the School Department Budget (May 8). This Tuesday (May 14) will cover the departments under the categories of Community Maintenance and Development; Human Resources Development; Intergovernmental; & Public Investment.

General Government & Public Safety: (May 7)

City Clerk
City Council
Election Commission
Employee Benefits
Equity and Inclusion
Equity and Inclusion – Diversity    
Equity and Inclusion – DGVPI
Executive – Leadership ✓
Executive – Communications ✓
Executive – Housing Liaison ✓
Executive – Tourism ✓
Finance – Administration ✓
Finance – Auditing
Finance – Assessing ✓
Finance – Budget
Finance – General Services
Finance – Information Technology ✓    
Finance – Purchasing
Finance – Treasury/Revenue    
Human Resources ✓
Law
Mayor’s Office*
Public Celebrations ✓
Reserve
Animal Commission
Community Safety ✓
Emergency Communications
Fire Department ✓
Inspectional Services ✓
License Commission
Police Department ✓
PRAB / Peace Commission ✓
Traffic, Parking & Transportation ✓
Those marked in bold are the ones pulled for discussion. *to appear at May 14 hearing
Community Maintenance and Development; Human Resources Development; Intergovernmental; & Public Investment: (May 14)

Mayor’s Office* ✓
Cambridge Health Alliance ✓    
Cable TV
Capital Building Projects ✓
Community Development ✓
Debt Service
Historical Commission
Housing ✓
Office of Sustainability ✓    
Public Works ✓
Water ✓
Women’s Commission
Human Rights Commission    
Human Services ✓
Library
Veterans’ Services
Cherry Sheet
MWRA
City Overview Section
Financial Summaries Section
Revenue Section
Public Investment Section ✓
Those marked in bold are the ones pulled for discussion. *postponed from May 7 hearing

Monday night’s featured attractions include these:Money

Manager’s Agenda #5. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the appointments of the following persons as members of the Danehy Park Improvement Plan Working Group: Ty Bellitti, Sarina Canelake, Katia Crowley, Anthony Galluccio, Chala Hadimi, Emily Hoffman, Tsion Kebede, Frederico Muchnik, Mike Nakagawa, Natasa Ristivojevic, Antonieta Salguero, Kathleen Riesing, Michael Siegall, Jason Targoff, and David Weylan.
pulled by Nolan; comments by Nolan, McGovern, Toner, Wilson, DPW Commissioner Kathy Watkins, City Manager Yi-An Huang; Placed on File 8-1 (Siddiqui Absent)

Manager’s Agenda #6. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the appointments of Raffi Freeman and Krissandra Robinson as well as the reappointments of Susan Schlesinger, James G. Stockard Jr., and Elaine Thorne as members of the Affordable Housing Trust for a term of three years.
Appointments Approved 8-1 (Siddiqui Absent)

Our Affordable Housing Trust reminds me of New York’s Robert Moses. From Wikipedia: “He created and led numerous semi-autonomous public authorities, through which he controlled millions of dollars in revenue and directly issued bonds to fund new ventures with little outside input or oversight.”

Manager’s Agenda #7. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 24-16, regarding a report on developing ways to fund support of decarbonization and clean energy projects and technical assistance for property owners of all types especially those with limited resources, with an initial focus on work associated with BEUDO emissions reduction requirements.
pulled by Nolan; comments by Nolan, Pickett, Sustainability Czarina Susanne Rasmussen; Placed on File 8-1 (Siddiqui Absent)

One of my greatest concerns about BEUDO (which should really be referred to as BEUDERO (Building Energy Use Disclosure and Emissions Reductions Ordinance) since it’s no longer just about “energy use disclosure”) is the unfunded mandate nature of the whole thing. Even my smaller residential building (triple-decker) will eventually be in the cross-hairs of City officials who would require me to tear out my heating system and gas appliances whether I want to or not. It’s one thing to provide incentives for people to make such changes at the time of eventual building renovations, but I will never warm up to the idea that I shouldn’t have any choice in the matter. This communication at least hints at the possibility of funding and other incentives.

Manager’s Agenda #8. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to a request to move to Executive Session to discuss strategy with respect to litigation known as City of Cambridge et al., v. Lexington Planning Board et al. (Docket No. 2381CV01683), which is an appeal before the Land Court. Additionally, to consider the purchase of real property, O Cambridge/Concord Turnpike in Lexington, Massachusetts, adjacent to the Hobbs Brook Reservoir. Discussing this matter in an open session may have a detrimental effect on the negotiating position of the City.
pulled by Sobrinho-Wheeler; Executive Session (52 minutes); Placed on File 8-1 (Siddiqui Absent)

I believe this concerns this decision of the Lexington Planning Board.

Order #1. That the City Manager is requested to direct the Community Development Department to work with the Co-Chairs of the Housing Committee to turn their vision of multifamily housing citywide into zoning language.   Councillor Azeem, Councillor Siddiqui
pulled by McGovern; comments by Azeem, McGovern, Pickett, Toner, Sobrinho-Wheeler, Nolan (w/amendment), Wilson, Simmons; Order Adopted as Amended on Voice Vote (Siddiqui Absent)

Note: There has not yet been a report from this committee on this topic (though you can watch a recording of the hearing here). Also, in all my years of watching and reporting on City Council meetings have I ever seen an order phrased as “to turn their vision…into…”. There is some pretty serious hubris in having the sponsors of a City Council order refer to their own “vision”. Check your egos at the door please.

By the way, this “vision” is filled with half-truths, falsehoods, and basically comes down to making the standards of height and density associated with the densest parts of eastern Cambridge the standard across all residential districts of the city. This is NOT simply a matter of permitting multi-family housing citywide.

Order #2. That the City Council calls upon the City Manager to take steps to bring support to efforts supporting Overdose Prevention Center legislation currently under consideration in the Massachusetts Senate and House of Representatives.   Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Azeem, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler
pulled by McGovern; comments by McGovern (w/amendment), Nolan, Azeem, Pickett, Wilson, Simmons (in defense of Central Square); Amendments Adopted on Voice Vote; Order Adopted as Amended on Voice Vote (Siddiqui Absent)

It’s one thing to take steps to prevent overdose deaths, but what Mr. McGovern is advocating here will likely help to further define Central Square as a prime destination for substance abusers, and with comes all the additional burdens associated with that degradation (shoplifting, aggressive panhandling, street robberies, drug dealers, people shopping and socializing elsewhere). We should aspire to better things for Central Square and all of Cambridge. – Robert Winters

4 Comments »

  1. Cambridge has a Museum of History and Culture? Who runs it? Is it a city project, a nonprofit, or something else?

    Google seems to confuse it with History Cambridge, which was historically known as the Cambridge Historical Society.

    Comment by Jennifer Aldred — May 15, 2024 @ 2:53 pm

  2. Is Marc McGovern advocating for an Overdose Prevention Center to be located in Central Square? What services would such a center provide?

    Comment by Jennifer Aldred — May 15, 2024 @ 2:55 pm

  3. I know that there is an idea to have a Cambridge Museum – mainly due to the advocacy of Denise Simmons, but I don’t know that there are any definite plans for it yet. Some people have suggested that the former Citizens Bank building at Temple/Mass Ave that the City now owns might be a good location for it. Others want it down on Windsor Street, but I doubt whether that would bring many visitors. Perhaps the Office of Tourism could operate it and use sales revenue to support the staffing.

    Comment by Robert Winters — May 15, 2024 @ 3:52 pm

  4. Regarding the early proposals for an Overdose Prevention Center from McGovern, I think there is little doubt that he would want it sited in Central Square. We already have the Needle Exchange which for some time didn’t care so much for exchanging so much as simply distributed needles. I don’t know if their original (Trojan Horse) mission of AIDS/HIV prevention is even part of their mission anymore. They are primarily in the enabling business now.

    Should we become saddled with McGovern’s Injection Facility, any promises of helping to get people off substance abuse will likely be soon abandoned as they focus entirely on facilitation of substance abuse.

    Comment by Robert Winters — May 15, 2024 @ 3:59 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Powered by WordPress