Cambridge Civic Journal Forum

HISTORY OF CAMBRIDGE
Rev. Lucius Paige, 1877

CHAPTER XX.

INDIAN HISTORY.

IN describing the original settlement of Cambridge by the English, the author of “Wonder-working Providence” calls attention to their preservation when “they were in such great straites for foode”; and what “was more remarkable, when they had scarce houses to shelter themselves, and no doores to hinder the Indians accesse to all they had in them, yet did the Lord so awe their hearts, that although they frequented the Englishmens places of aboade, where their whole substance, weake wives, and little ones, lay open to their plunder during their absence, being whole dayes at Sabbath-assemblies, yet had they none of their food or stuffe diminished, neither children nor wives hurt in the least measure, although the Indians came commonly to them at those times, much hungry belly (as they use to say) and were then in number and strength beyond the English by far.” ¹ There may have been some Indians in the easterly part of the town, as in old records that section is sometimes styled “Wigwam Neck”; but the far greater number probably dwelt near Menotomy River and Mystic Pond. They were subject to the “Squaw-sachem,” formerly wife of Nanepashemet, who is mentioned in “Mourt’s Relation.” A party from Plymouth visited the Indians at “the bottom of the Massachusetts Bay,” whose sachem, Obbatinewat, a subject of Massasoit, “used us very kindly; he told us he durst not then remain in any settled place, for fear of the Tarentines. Also the squaw-sachim, or Massachusetts queen was an enemy to him.” ² On promise of protection, however, he “went along with us, to bring us to the squaw-sachim.” Crossing the bay to its northerly side, “we went ashore, all but two men, and marched in arms up in the country. Having gone three miles, me came to a place where corn had been newly gathered, a house pulled down, and the people gone. A mile from hence, Nanepashemet their king in his life-time had lived. His house was not like others, but a scaffold was largely built, with poles and planks some six foot from ground, and the house upon that, being situated on the top of a hill. Not far from hence in a bottom, we came to a fort built by their deceased king, the manner thus: there were poles, some thirty or forty foot long, stuck in the ground as thick as they could be set one by another, and with these they enclosed a ring some forty or fifty foot over. A trench breast high was digged on each side; one way there was to go into it with a bridge; in the midst of this palisado stood the frame of a house, wherein being dead he lay buried. About a mile from hence, we came to such another, but seated on the top of an hill; here Nanepashemet was killed, none dwelling in it since the time of his death.” ³ After his decease, his widow administered the government of the tribe as squaw-sachem, and married Webcowits, her principal powwow, conjurer, or medicine man. By this marriage, however, he did not become a sachem, or king, but merely a prince-consort.

In the “First General Letter of the Governor and Deputy of the New England Company for a Plantation in Massachusetts Bay, to the Governor and Council for London’s Plantation in the Massachusetts Bay in New England,” dated “In Gravesend the 17th of April, 1629,” is this important direction, – “If any of the salvages pretend right of inheritance to all or any part of the lands granted in our pattent, wee pray you endeavour to purchase their tytle, that wee may avoyde the least scruple of intrusion.” ⁴ Accordingly, at the session of the General Court, March 13, 1638-9, “Mr. Gibons was desired to agree with the Indians for the land within the bounds of Watertowne, Cambridge, and Boston.” ⁵ The deed of conveyance, or release of title, I have not been able to find; yet there is sufficient evidence that the purchase was made of the squaw-sachem, and that the price was duly paid. The General Court ordered, May 20, 1610, that the 18^l. 8^s. 6^d layd out by Capt. Gibons shall bee paid him, vid.: 13^l. 8^s. 6^d. by Watertowne and 10^l. by Cambridge; and also Cambridge is to give Squa-Sachem a coate every winter while shee liveth.” ⁶ This sale or conveyance to Cambridge is recognized in a deed executed Jan. 13, 1639, by the “Squa-Sachem of Misticke” and her husband Webcowits, whereby they conveyed to Jotham Gibbons “the reversion of all that parcel of land which lies against the ponds at Mistick aforesaid, together with the said ponds, all which we reserved from Charlestown and Cambridge, late called Newtowne, and all hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, after the death of me the said Squa-Sachem.” ⁷ The inhabitants of Cambridge lived on friendly terms with the Indians; at least, no evidence appears to the contrary. They paid their allotted dues to the Squa-Sachem, and made full compensation for all losses which she sustained through their default. The Town Records show that, on the 10th of April, 1643, “agreed with the Indians, by the present townsmen, to pay to Squa-Sachem 8 bushels of Indian corn, after next harvest. It is agreed likewise, that George Cooke being at the charge to make a fence of two sufficient rails in the town line, about half a mile in length, the fence to begin at the outside of George Cooke’s land, running out northward to meet Captain Gibbines his fence., to secure the Indian’s corn, it is agreed that the town will pay for the making the fence.” Again, Nov. 11, 1643, Agreed, that the cow-keepers shall pay six bushels of corn to squa-sachem, for the damage done to her corn, upon the Sabbath day, through the neglect of the keepers, in the year 1642.”

On the 8th of March, 1643-4, the “Squa-Sachim” with four other Indian rulers, voluntarily put herself “under the government and jurisdiction of the Massachusetts, to be governed and protected by them,” and promised “to be true and faithful to the said government.” ⁸ She is supposed to have died not long before 1662, when a claim was made for land in which she had reserved a life estate. ⁹

One of the Indian Chiefs, who united with the Squaw-sachem in this act of submission to the government and jurisdiction of the Massachusetts,” was Cutshamache, Cutshamakin, or Kuchamakin, who resided “at a place called Neponsitt, within the bounds of Dorchester.” ¹⁰ His authority extended over those who dwelt at Nonantum, which was then included in Cambridge. With these Indian neighbors the English maintained peace. In one respect their relations were peculiarly interesting. When Rev. John Eliot commenced the public labors of his mission, “the first place he began to preach at was Nonantum, near Watertown Mill, upon the south side of Charles River, about four or five miles from his own house, where lived at that time Waban, one of their principal men, and some Indians with him.” ¹¹ Eliot had previously devoted much time to the task of acquiring a competent knowledge of the Indian language, and had imparted religious instruction to individuals, as he had opportunity. At length he commenced his public ministry to the heathen, as thus related by himself: “Upon October 28, 1646, four of us (having sought God) went unto the Indians inhabiting within our bounds, with a desire to make known the things of their peace to them. A little before we came to their Wigwams, five or six of the chief of them met us with English salutations, bidding us much welcome; who leading us into the principal wigwam of Waaubon, we found many more Indians, men, women, children, gathered together from all quarters round about, according to appointment, to meet with us, and learn of us. Waaubon, the chief minister of justice among them, exhorting and inviting them before thereunto, being one who gives more grounded hopes of serious respect to the things of God than ally that as yet I have known of that forlorn generation,” etc. ¹² My prescribed limits will not admit a particular account of this primitive Christian mission to the Indians. Briefly, they were visited in a similar manner, November 11 and 26, and December 9, in the same year. At these several meetings, by prayers, and sermons, and familiar questions and answers, an earnest effort was made to impart to them a knowledge of the Gospel. A particular description of the means used, and of the encouraging results, is given by Eliot in a tract entitled, “The Day-breaking if not the Sun-rising of the Gospel with the Indians in New England,” printed at London, 1647, and reprinted in the Collections of the Massachusetts Historical Society, xxiv. 1-23. In this missionary work, Mr. Eliot was assisted by Rev. Thomas Shepard of Cambridge and others. In a tract entitled “The Clear Sunshine of the Gospel breaking forth upon the Indians in New England,” printed at London, 1648, Mr. Shepard says, “As soone as ever the fiercenesse of the winter was past, March 3, 1647, I went out to Noonanetum to the Indian Lecture, where Mr. Wilson, Mr. Allen of Dedham, Mr. Dunster, beside many other Christians were present.” ¹³ At a later day, Mr. Eliot was assisted by his son John (H. C. 1656), by Daniel Gookin, son of General Gookin (H. C. 1669), and by others. For several years, the mission was successful beyond all reasonable expectation. The Indians at Nonantum soon became so far civilized as well as Christianized, that they desired to live in a more orderly way. Accordingly a tract of land, called by the natives Natick, or a Place of Hills, was assigned by the General Court, for their exclusive use. “In the year 1651, the town of Natick was settled. It consisted of three long streets, two on the north and one on the south side of the river, with a bridge eighty feet-long, and eight feet high, and stone foundations, the whole being built by the Indians themselves. To each house situated on these streets was attached a piece of land. The houses were in the Indian style. One house, larger and more commodious than the rest, was built in the English style. One apartment of it was used as a school-room on week-days, and as a place of worship on the Sabbath. The upper room was a kind of wardrobe, where the Indians hung up their skins and other valuables. In the corner of this room was partitioned off an apartment for Mr. Eliot. This building was the first meeting house in Natick.” ¹⁴ “In this town was the first church of Indians embodied, in the year of our Lord, 1660.” ¹⁵

The Christian mission was not confined to the dwellers at Nonantum. Mr. Eliot, and others whom God raised up, both English and Indians, preached the word with success to other tribes. In addition to his other labors, Mr. Eliot translated the whole Bible into the English tongue, which was printed at Cambridge, the New Testament in 1661, and the Old Testament in 1663. He also prepared an Indian Grammar, and translated into the Indian tongue several tracts written by himself and others,¹⁶ all which were also printed in Cambridge. It was very properly said by the Rev. Mr. McKenzie, “Let it be remembered to the honor of our fathers, that the first Protestant mission to the heathen in modern times began in Cambridge; the first Protestant sermon in a heathen tongue was preached here; the first translation of the Bible by an Englishman into a heathen tongue was printed here; the first Protestant tract in a heathen language was written and printed here.” ¹⁷ The result of all these labors up to the year 1674 was described by Gookin, in his “Historical Collections of the Indians in New England,” printed in the first volume of Collections of the Massachusetts Historical Society. Besides Natick, the most important of all, there were six communities in Massachusetts, exclusive of Plymouth, which had long been denominated “praying towns;” namely, Pakemitt, or Punkapaog (now Stoughton); Hassanamesitt, or Hassanamisco (Grafton); Okommakamesit (Marlborough); Wamesit, or Pawtuckett (Tewksbury); Nashobah (Littleton); Magunkaquog (Hopkinton). There were also seven “new praying towns,” where the Gospel had been favorably received about three years: Manchage (Oxford); Chabanakongkomun (Dudley); Maanexit (north part of Woodstock, at that time included in Massachusetts); Quantisset (southeast part of Woodstock); Wabquissit (southwest part of Woodstock); Packachoog (south part of Worcester); Waeuntug (Uxbridge). “There are two other Indian towns; viz., Weshakin¹⁸ and Quabaug,¹⁹ which are coming on to receive the gospel; and reckoning these, there are nine in the Nipmuck country.” ²⁰ In these fourteen established towns, there were two organized churches, and, as Gookin estimated, about eleven hundred “souls yielding obedience to the gospel.”

Meantime an earnest effort was made to impart scientific as well as religious knowledge to the Indians, in which commendable work Mr. Eliot was a prominent actor. His labors and their result are described by Gookin in his “Historical Collections.” Besides preaching and inducing others to preach the Gospel, and translating the Bible and other books into the Indian language, – “he took great care that schools should be planted among the praying Indians; and he taught some himself to read, that they might be capable to teach others; and by his procurement some of the choice Indian youths were put to school with English schoolmasters, to learn both English, Latin, and Greek tongues. There was much cost out of the Corporation stock expended in this work, for fitting and preparing the Indian youth to be learned and able preachers unto their countrymen. Their diet, apparel, books and schooling, was chargeable. In truth the design was prudent, noble, and good; but it proved ineffectual to the ends proposed; for several of the said youth died, after they had been sundry years at learning, and made good proficiency therein. Others were disheartened, and left learning after they were almost ready for the college. And some returned to live among their countrymen, where some of them are improved for schoolmasters and teachers, unto which they are advantaged by their education. Some others of them have entered upon other callings; as one is a mariner; another, a carpenter; another went for England with a gentleman that lived sometimes at Cambridge in New England, named Mr. Drake, which Indian, as I heard, died there not many months after his arrival. I remember but only two of them all that lived in the college at Cambridge; the one named Joel, the other Caleb, both natives of Martha’s Vineyard. These two were hopeful young men, especially Joel, being so ripe in learning, that he should, within a few months, have taken his first degree of bachelor of art in the college. He took a voyage to Martha’s Vineyard, to visit his father and kindred, a little before the commencement, but upon his return back in a vessel, with other passengers and mariners, suffered shipwreck upon the island of Nantucket. . . . . The other, called Caleb, not long after he took his degree of bachelor of art ²¹ at Cambridge in New England, died of a consumption at Charlestown, where he was placed by Mr. Thomas Danforth, who had inspection over him, under the care of a physician in order to his health, where he wanted not for the best means the country could afford, both of food and physick; but God denied the blessing, and put a period to his days.” ²²

The records of the Commissioners of the United Colonies of New England contain accounts of sundry payments for the maintenance and instruction of Indian scholars, some of them very young, from 1656 to 1672. An earlier account is preserved in the “Massachusetts Archives,” xxx. 9, which may serve as a sample: –

“An account of expenses layd out for y^e country from August 1645 until this 8^th of October 1646.

“I pray y^o to appoint mee part of my pay as far as that will reach in the hands of Henrie Shrimpton both because I am ingaged to him and hee hath promissed to accept y^t pay, & if y^t y^e Indians require pay back at his hands I shall bee ready to repay him such as they shal accept. Further, wheras the Indians with mee bee so small as that they [are] uncapable of y^e benefit of such learning as was my desire to impart to y^m & therfore they being an hindrance to mee and I no furtherance to them, I desire they may bee somwhere else disposed of w^th all convenient speed. So I rest in what I can.
    Yrs HENRIE DUNSTER.”

This account was referred to a committee, who reported, –

“Wee thinke meete Mr. Dunster should be paid 22^l. 16^s. 2^d. The magistrates consent to this return of the s^d Committee,
    “JO : WINTHROP, Govr.
    “Consented to by y^e deput^s.     EDWARD RAWSON.”

In this praiseworthy effort to enlighten, and civilize, and Christianize the Indians, Cambridge shares the glory with Roxbury. Not only was the gospel first preached to them here, and many of their youth here educated, but some of the most conspicuous and energetic laborers in this field of duty resided here. Omitting for the present all mention of others, if the labors of John Eliot of Roxbury entitled him to be regarded as an “Apostle,” or as standing in the place of Aaron as a high-priest to them in spiritual things, with equal propriety may Daniel Gookin of Cambridge be regarded as their Moses, – their civil instructor, ruler, judge, and historian. The “praying Indians” are said to have been early persuaded by Mr. Eliot, Aug. 6, 1651, to adopt the Mosaic form of government, by electing rulers of hundreds, of fifties, and of tens.²³ “Moreover the General Court appointed and empowered one of the English magistrates, to join with the chief of their rulers,²⁴ and keep a higher court among them; extending the power of this court to the latitude of a county court among the English; from the jurisdiction whereof nothing for good order and government, civil or criminal, is expected [excepted?] but appeals, life, limb, banishment, and cases of divorce. The first English magistrate, chosen to be ruler over the praying Indians in the colony of Massachusetts, was first Mr. D. G.²⁵ the author of these Collections; and this was in A. D. 1656. But not long after his occasions called him for England for two or three years, one Major Humphrey Atherton was appointed to conduct this affair, which he did about three years. But then the Lord taking him to himself by death, and the author being returned back, in the year 1660, a year or more before Major Atherton’s death, was again called and reinstated in that employ, A. D. 1661, and hath continued in that work hitherto.” ²⁶ In this position Gookin continued until the Charter government was abrogated in 1686: and most faithfully did he perform his duty. He tells us that besides causing the orders of the General Court to be observed, sundry other things were to be “done by him in order to their good; as the making of orders, and giving instructions and directions, backed with penalties, for promoting and practising morality, civility, industry, and diligence in their particular callings:” he was also “to make and execute good orders for keeping holy the sabbath day; and that the people do attend the public worship of God; and that schools for the education of youth be settled and continued among them.” ²⁷ His own record of a court held at Wabquissit, in 1674, illustrates the manner of proceeding: After Mr. Eliot had preached, “then I began a court among the Indians. And first I approved their teacher Sampson, and their Constable Black James; giving each of them a charge to be diligent and faithful in their places. Also I exhorted the people to yeild obedience to the gospel of Christ, and to those set in order there. Then published a warrant or order that I had prepared, empowering the constable to suppress drunkenness, sabbath-breaking, especially powowing and idolatry; and, after warning given, to apprehend all delinquents, and bring them before authority, to answer for their misdoings; the smaller faults to bring before Wattasacompanum, ruler of the Nipmuck country; for idolatry and powowing, to bring them before me.” ²⁸ A life-like picture of one of these courts is exhibited in Gookin’s certified copy of its session: –

“At a Court held at Naticke among the Indians, Sept. 14, 1681. The testimonies of several aged and principal Indians hereafter named, taken in Court, as followeth:

“Present, Daniel Gookin senr. Esq., Assistant.
Waban, Piambow, Tom Tray} Rulers     Mr. John Eliot, senr., Andrew Pittimee, Peter Ephraim} Interpreters.

“Waban, aged about eighty years, Piambow, aged about eighty years, Nowanit, aged about 81 years, Jethro, aged about 70 years, William, aged 68 years, Anthony Tray and Tom Tray, unkells by the father’s side unto John Woampas deceased, aged 60 years and fifty-eight or thereabout,” testified that the said “John Woampas was no Sachem, and had no more right or title to any lands in the Nipmuk country within [the bounds] of Massachusetts than any other common Indians;” and therefore they disclaimed and repudiated all sales or gifts of land pretended to have been made by him.²⁹

Under the joint instruction and superintendence of Eliot and Gookin, slow but encouraging progress was made in civilizing and Christianizing the Indians in Massachussetts, as far west as the westerly border of Worcester County; and a similar good work was accomplished in the Colony of Plymouth. The two races maintained peaceful relations with each other until 1675, when that terrible contest commenced, which is generally known as Philip’s War. And even then, Gookin insists that the Christian Indians, in the seven old praying towns, were true friends to the English, and rendered them important assistance; and he intimates that the magistrates agreed with him in opinion, while the popular branch of the government and the common people generally, lost all confidence in the Indians, and insisted that, without distinction, they should be treated as enemies. Having mentioned some instances of useful information given by the Indians, and services rendered by them as soldiers, Gookin says, “Notwithstanding those signal and faithful services done by those Christian Indians, and divers others not here related, yet the animosity and rage of the common people increased against them, that the very name of a praying Indian was spoken against, in so much that some wise and principal men did advise some that were concerned with them to forbear giving that epithet of praying. . . . . Things growing to this height among the English, the Governor and Council, against their own reason and inclination, were put upon a kind of necessity, for gratifying the people, to disband all the praying Indians, and to make and publish an order to confine them to five of their own villages, and not to stir above one mile from the centre of such place, upon peril of their lives.” ³⁰ “This cruel frame of spirits (for I can give it no gentler denomination) arose, I apprehend, from a double ground; first the malice of Satan against Christ’s work among the Indians, and to hinder their progress in religion. . . . . A second root of this trouble arose from the perfidious and unfaithful dealing of the wicked Indians, and their causeless rage and cruelty and fury against the English, and particularly the Springfield and Northampton Indians, who lived near the English and seemed to carry it fair for a time, but at last proved perfidious and treacherous. But there was not one of them that ever I heard of, that was a pretender to Christian religion.” ³¹ It is possible that a desire to appropriate the land of the Indians to their own use may have had some influence on the populace then, as it has in more recent times.

Afterwards, orders were issued for the removal of the Indians to Deer Island; and Gookin relates the manner in which the Natick tribe was removed. “In pursuance of this order, Capt. Thomas Prentiss (who was a person civil and friendly to those Indians), with a party of horse, was commanded to bring them down speedily to a place called the Pines upon Charles River, about two miles above Cambridge, where boats were appointed to be in readiness to take them on board, and take them to the aforesaid island. . . . . Good Mr. Eliot, that faithful instructor and teacher of the praying Indians, met them at the place before mentioned, where they were to be embarked, who comforted, and encouraged, and instructed, and prayed with them and for them; exhorting them to patience in their sufferings, and confirming the hearts of those disciples of Christ, and exhorting them to continue in the faith, for through many tribulations we must enter into the kingdom of heaven. . . . . In the night, about midnight, the tide serving, being the 30th of October, 1675, these poor creatures were shipped in three vessels and carried away to Deer Island above mentioned, which was distant from that place about four leagues, where I shall leave them at present.” ³² In May, 1676, many of the men having performed military service for the English, permission was granted by the General Court for the departure of the Indians from the Island. The remnant of the Natick tribe, after a temporary residence near Nonantum, returned to their own town, which was under the management of Indian officers for nearly a century, until it was incorporated as an English district in 1762. “From 1651 to 1762” Natick “was an Indian town; and its history is little more than a picture of wild Indians making unsuccessful attempts to clothe themselves in the robes of civilization.” ³³

While the Christian Indians mere passing through this furnace of affliction, they had a faithful friend in Gookin, who labored constantly to avert the evils to which they were exposed and to alleviate those which they suffered. In this labor of love he had the constant support of Thomas Danforth, his associate in many a hard-fought political battle on other fields. Indeed it would seem that most of the magistrates, or Court of Assistants, concurred with him in a desire to deal kindly with the praying Indians; but that they were to some extent compelled by the populace to adopt harsh measures. He says, “the enmity, jealousy, and clamors of some people against them put the magistracy upon a kind of necessity to send them all to the island.” ³⁴ Again, an Indian who had a certificate of fidelity from Gookin and was actually employed in the public service as a secret agent, was apprehended by Capt. Henchman, who, “being ignorant of the design, sent both him his pass to the Governor, at Boston, who more to satisfy the clamors of the people than for any offence committed by this man, he was committed to the common jail. . . . . He had committed no offence (that ever I heard of), but was imprisoned merely to still the clamors of the people, who railed much against this poor fellow, and fain would have had him put to death (though they knew not wherefore). But those murmurings were not only against the Indian, but as much against Major Gookin, who granted him the certificate.” ³⁵ Again, he says, “notwithstanding the council’s endeavors in the former orders, and the testimony of these English witnesses³⁶ on behalf of the Christian Indians, yet the clamors and animosity among the common people increased daily, not only against those Indians, but also against all such English as mere judged to be charitable to them, and particularly, many harsh reflections and speeches were uttered against Major Daniel Gookin and Mr. John Eliot.” ³⁷

As a specimen of the popular “clamors and animosity,” I copy a few manuscripts : –

“Elizabeth Belcher, aged 57, Martha Remington, aged 31, and Mary Mitchell, aged 20, being sworne, doe say, that on y^e 28th day of Feb^r. last, ab^t 10 of the clocke at night, Ri: Scott came into y^e house of y^e said Belcher, and suddenly after he came in broak out into many hideous raileing expressions ag^t y^e worⁿ Capt. Daniel Gookin, calling him an Irish dog y^t was never faithful to his country, the sonne of a whoare, a bitch, a rogue, God confound him, & God rott his soul, saying if I could meet him alone I would pistoll him. I wish my knife and sizers were in his heart. He is the devils interpreter. I and two or three more designed to cut of all Gookins brethren at the Island, but some English dog discovered it, the devil will plague him,” etc. Sworn before Simon Willard, Assistant, March 4, 1675-6.³⁸ Scott was fined and imprisoned; he afterwards made a very humble confession, and was released.

Two copies of a written handbill are preserved, dated on the same day that Scott gave vent to his wrath: “Boston, February 28, 1675. Reader thou art desired not to supprese this paper, but to promote its designe, which is to certify (those traytors to their king and countrey) Guggins and Danford, that some generous spirits have vowed their destruction; as Christians wee warne them to prepare for death, for though they will deservedly dye, yet we wish the health of their soules. By y^e new society. A. B. C. D.” ³⁹

The following memorandum was entered by Rev. John Eliot, on his Church Record: “1676. On the 7^th day of the 2^d month, Capt. Gookins, Mr. Danforth, & Mr. Stoughton w^r sent by the Councill to order matters at Long Island for the Indians planting there, ya called me w^th y^m. In o^r way thither a great boat of about 14 ton, meeting us, turned head upon us (wheth^r willfully or by negligence, God he knoweth), y^a run the sterne of o^r boate w^r we 4 sat under water. O^r boats saile or something tangled with the great boat, and by God’s mercy kept to it. My cosin Jacob & cosin Perrie being forwarder in o^r boat quickly got up into the great boat. I so sunk y^t I drank in salt water twice, & could not help it. God assisted my two cosins to deliver us all, & help us up into the great boat. We were not far from the Castle, where we went ashore, dryed & refreshed, & yⁿ went to the Island, performed o^r work, returned well home at night, praised be the Lord. Some thanked God, & some wished we had been drowned. Soone after, one y^t wished we had been drowned, was himself drowned about the same place w^r we w^r so wonderfully delivered: the history w^roff is” –. Here the account abruptly ends.

At a later day, John Marshall testified that on the 9th of October, 1677, “I saw John Joans driveing his trucks, whipping his horses which caused them to run very furiously; the worshipful Thomas Danforth being before the trucks shifted the way several times to escape the horses, and I was afraid they would have ran over him; but having escaped them, when the said Joans came to the wharfe where I was, I asked him why he drave his trucks soe hard to run over people, and told him he had like to have ran over Mr. Danforth; he answered it was noe matter if Mr. Danforth and Major Gucking were both hanged. Sworn in Court. J. Dudley, Assistant. 12. 8. 77. Said Jones is sentenced to be admonished, and not to drive a cart in Boston upon penalty of a severe whipping.  J. DUDLEY, per order.” ⁴⁰

On account of the popular exasperation, Capt. Gookin failed of election in May, 1676, as one of the Assistants. The General Court, however, manifested their sympathy and confidence, by promoting him, at their first session, to the office of Sergeant-major, or chief commander of the militia in the County. During the year, the tide of feeling changed in his favor, and in May, 1677, he was reinstated in his former position as an Assistant. Thenceforth, both he and his associate, Danforth, retained their hold on the public confidence until the close of life.

Notes:
1  Coll. Mass: Hist. Soc., xiii. 138.

2  Charles River, anciently called Quineboquin, was the natural boundary between these two hostile tribes. The Squaw-sachem seems to have resided on the westerly side of Mystic Pond. A deposition of Edward Johnson is preserved among the papers of the Middlesex County Court (1662), testifying that he was present when the Squaw-sachem and her husband in 1639 “did give and sell unto Charlestown all their lands within the limits of Charlestown, except that on the west side of the Ponds called Misticke, where their wigwam then stood, which they reserved for term of her life,” etc.

3  Coll. Mass. Hist. Soc., xix. 57, 58.

4  Mass. Col. Rec., i. 394.

5  Mass. Col. Rec., i. 254.

6  Mass. Col. Rec., i. 292.

7  The original deed is preserved in the files of the Middlesex County Court, 1662, having been used as evidence in a legal controversy concerning the lands conveyed to Gibbons. Besides the Indian marks, it bears the autographs of John Winthrop, John Endicott, Richard Saltonstall, Thomas Flint, Thomas Danforth and William Aspinwall.

8  Mass. Col. Rec., ii. 55.

9  Brooks’ Hist. Medford, p. 74.

10  Coll. Mass. Hist. Soc., i. 169. He is styled “Sagamore of the Massachusetts” in his sale of land in Andover to John Woodbridge and his associates, and “Sachem of Massachusetts” in a similar sale of land in Dorchester to Richard Collecott “for the use of the plantation of Dorchester.” – Mass. Arch., xxx. 7, 15.

11  Ibid., p. 168.

12  Coll. Mass. Hist. Soc., xxiv. 3.

13  Coll. Mass. Hist. Soc., xxiv. 41.

14  Bacon’s History of Natick, p. 9.

15  Coll. Mass. Hist. Soc., i. 181.

16  One or more of them is said to have been written by Mr. Shepard.

17  Hist. Lect., p. 67.

18  Or Nashaway, now Lancaster.

19  Brookfield.

20  Coll. Mass. Hist. Soc., i. 189-195.

21  “Caleb Cheeshahteanmuck, Indus,” 1665, is the solitary Indian name found on the Triennial Catalogue of Harvard College.

22  Coll. Mass. Hist. Soc., i. 172, 173.

23  Coll. Mass. Hist. Soc., xxiv. 171.

24  Gookin bears honorable testimony to the character of one of these rulers. In describing Natick he says: “In this town they have residing some of their principal rulers, the chief whereof is named Waban, who is now above seventy years of age. He is a person of great prudence and piety; I do not know any Indian that excels him.” – Coll. Mass. Hist. Soc., i. 183, 184. This Waban was the same who made arrangements for the first missionary visit of Eliot to Nonantum, as heretofore related. His sign manual, or mark, is preserved in the Cambridge Records, affixed to an agreement “to keep about six-score head of dry cattle on the south side of Charles River,” in 1647. He was living in 1681, then “aged about eighty years.”

25  DanieI Gookin.

26  Coll. Mass. Hist. Soc., i. 177.

27  Ibid., i. 178.

28  Coll. Mass. Hist. Soc., i. 192.

29  Mass. Arch., xxx. 260.

30  Coll. Amer. Antiq. Soc., ii. 449, 450.

31  Ibid., ii. 454.

32  Coll. Amer. Antiq. Soc., ii. 473, 474.

33  Bacon’s Hist. of Natick, p. 23.

34  Coll. Amer. Ant. Soc., ii. 485.

35  Coll. Amer. Ant. Soc., ii. 481.

36  John Watson, Sen., and Henry Prentiss, both of Cambridge, who by direction of the Council dwelt with the Natick Indian; about twelve weeks, and certified their obedience to God and their faithfulness to the English.

37  Coll. Amer. Ant. Soc., ii. 452, 453.

38  Mass. Arch., xxx. 192.

39  Mass. Arch., xxx. 193.

40  Mass. Arch., viii. 4.

Notes re-indexed from original