Spring Backwards – March 20, 2023 Cambridge City Council meeting
Spring officially begins Monday, Mar 20, 2023 at 5:24pm. Six minutes later the Cambridge City Council will spring backwards into Zoom isolation. Here are the agenda items that caught my attention:
Manager’s Agenda #1. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the new appointments of Maria Guadalupe Arlotto and Brendan Koscher as members of the Police Review and Advisory Board for terms of five years.
Appointments Approved 9-0
Manager’s Agenda #2. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 23-05, regarding a report on beginning the process of obtaining police body worn cameras (BWC) for the Cambridge Police Department, and to work with all appropriate departments to produce policy recommendations that would allow body worn camera usage while also not violating civil liberties in compliance with the City’s Surveillance Ordinance.
pulled by Toner; comments by PT, DS, MM, PN (critical of previous city managers), QZ (opposed to body cameras); responses by Commissioner Christine Elow, and Superintendent Freddie Cabral; Placed on File 9-0
Manager’s Agenda #3. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 23-09, regarding a report on engaging a third party, independent firm/consultant or university partner to review and examine the Cambridge Police Department’s policies and practices regarding de-escalation methods, mental health calls for service, training, and more.
pulled by Zondervan; questions from Siddiqui; comments by QZ (concerned about bidding process for contract – curious that no such concerns about HEART funding and contract; also challenging use of a police entity doing review), DS (noting that CPD already intentional about deescalation methods), AM, DC, PN, SS; responses by Elow, City Manager Huang; Placed on File 9-0
Charter Right #1. That the City Manager is requested to fund the HEART initiative and negotiate a contract for services with HEART, to include but not limited to HEART responding to certain 911 calls. [Charter Right – Nolan, Mar 6, 2023]
Siddiqui again says “charterwritten”; Toner moves to also discuss Comm. & Rpts. #3; Nolan reads prepared statement, says HEART expects to be ready in Fall, proposes amendments; Zondervan supportive of amendments; Toner OK with amendments but questions HEART, prefers to develop a scope of services for others to bid on, questions about liability; McGovern says that Manager believes that contracts with a non-profit entity do not need to go out to bid, floats notion of $8 million funding for HEART, fully supports Community Safety Department but wants HEART to be outside of any City department; Simmons notes her letter with Toner expressing concerns about HEART, notes model for non-police response that grew from Task Force, wants assurance that any entity chosen is actually equipped to do the job; Zondervan expresses support w/o any questions; Amendments Adopted 9-0; Order Adopted as Amended 7-1-0-1 (Simmons – Present; Toner – No)
Communications & Reports #3. A communication was received from Councillor Toner, transmitting Questions regarding Requests to Fund Heart Using City Funds.
Discussed along with Charter Right #1; Placed on File 9-0
It seems all but certain that the reason the City Council meeting is taking place on Mount Zoom this week is because of the multiple police-related agenda items and the inevitability of a PSL invasion (Party for Socialism and Liberation). We may also see further evidence of the current Mayor’s differences of opinion with the City Administration (and perhaps a signal of how she might prefer to change the Charter to gain more authority). [“In Cambridge, our charter grants the City Manager power over the Police Department as well as oversight of personnel matters. There have been repeated demands from the community to release the name of the officer who shot Faisal, and I personally believe this is an important step for the sake of transparency, but a statement released last week made clear the City will not do so.”]. Ms. Siddiqui’s definition of “the community” is not so clear.
Regarding HEART: There’s something disturbing about the fact that city councillors are pressing the City Manager to award a contract to a particular vendor – and especially a vendor with zero track record other than the consistent hostility of its adherents toward the Cambridge Police Department.
Manager’s Agenda #6. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to recommendations for the block rates for water consumption and sewer use for the period beginning Apr 1, 2023 and ending Mar 31, 2024. [FY24 water/sewer charts]
pulled by Nolan; comments by PN; responses by Owen O’Riorden, Kathy Watkins (DPW); Placed on File 9-0
The notable increases in the water rate this year actually exceed the increases in the sewer rate, but it has generally been the reverse for some time. It costs far more to lose the water than to supply it.
| Water Rates (per CcF) | FY05 | FY14 | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | |||
| Block 1 | 0 – 40 CcF | $2.73 | $3.02 | $3.02 | $3.02 | $3.02 | $3.02 | $3.02 | $3.02 | $3.02 | $3.05 | $3.11 | $3.32 | ||
| Block 2 | 41 – 400 CcF | $2.94 | $3.24 | $3.24 | $3.24 | $3.24 | $3.24 | $3.24 | $3.24 | $3.24 | $3.27 | $3.33 | $3.55 | ||
| Block 3 | 401 – 2,000 CcF | $3.11 | $3.44 | $3.44 | $3.44 | $3.44 | $3.44 | $3.44 | $3.44 | $3.44 | $3.47 | $3.54 | $3.77 | ||
| Block 4 | 2,001 – 10,000 CcF | $3.31 | $3.65 | $3.65 | $3.65 | $3.65 | $3.65 | $3.65 | $3.65 | $3.65 | $3.69 | $3.76 | $4.01 | ||
| Block 5 | Over 10,000 CcF | $3.58 | $3.96 | $3.96 | $3.96 | $3.96 | $3.96 | $3.96 | $3.96 | $3.96 | $4.00 | $4.08 | $4.35 | ||
| Sewer Rates (per CcF) | FY05 | FY14 | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | |||
| Block 1 | 0 – 40 CcF | $5.54 | $8.19 | $8.62 | $9.21 | $9.50 | $10.23 | $11.00 | $11.77 | $12.51 | $13.51 | $14.59 | $15.34 | ||
| Block 2 | 41 – 400 CcF | $5.87 | $8.67 | $9.12 | $9.74 | $10.05 | $10.82 | $11.63 | $12.44 | $13.22 | $14.28 | $15.42 | $16.21 | ||
| Block 3 | 401 – 2,000 CcF | $6.30 | $9.31 | $9.79 | $10.46 | $10.79 | $11.62 | $12.49 | $13.36 | $14.20 | $15.34 | $16.57 | $17.42 | ||
| Block 4 | 2,001 – 10,000 CcF | $6.79 | $10.02 | $10.54 | $11.26 | $11.62 | $12.51 | $13.45 | $14.39 | $15.30 | $16.52 | $17.84 | $18.75 | ||
| Block 5 | Over 10,000 CcF | $7.22 | $10.66 | $11.21 | $11.97 | $12.35 | $13.30 | $14.30 | $15.30 | $16.26 | $17.56 | $18.96 | $19.93 | ||
| Combined Rates (per CcF) | FY05 | FY14 | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | |||
| Block 1 | 0 – 40 CcF | $8.27 | $11.21 | $11.64 | $12.23 | $12.52 | $13.25 | $14.02 | $14.79 | $15.53 | $16.56 | $17.70 | $18.66 | ||
| Block 2 | 41 – 400 CcF | $8.81 | $11.91 | $12.36 | $12.98 | $13.29 | $14.06 | $14.87 | $15.68 | $16.46 | $17.55 | $18.75 | $19.76 | ||
| Block 3 | 401 – 2,000 CcF | $9.41 | $12.75 | $13.23 | $13.90 | $14.23 | $15.06 | $15.93 | $16.80 | $17.64 | $18.81 | $20.11 | $21.19 | ||
| Block 4 | 2,001 – 10,000 CcF | $10.10 | $13.67 | $14.19 | $14.91 | $15.27 | $16.16 | $17.10 | $18.04 | $18.95 | $20.21 | $21.60 | $22.76 | ||
| Block 5 | Over 10,000 CcF | $10.80 | $14.62 | $15.17 | $15.93 | $16.31 | $17.26 | $18.26 | $19.26 | $20.22 | $21.56 | $23.04 | $24.28 | ||
| Percent Increases (Water) | FY14 | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | 10 Year | 19 Year | ||
| Block 1 | 0 – 40 CcF | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.0% | 2.0% | 6.8% | 9.9% | 21.6% | |
| Block 2 | 41 – 400 CcF | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.9% | 1.8% | 6.6% | 9.6% | 20.7% | |
| Block 3 | 401 – 2,000 CcF | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.9% | 2.0% | 6.5% | 9.6% | 21.2% | |
| Block 4 | 2,001 – 10,000 CcF | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.1% | 1.9% | 6.6% | 9.9% | 21.1% | |
| Block 5 | Over 10,000 CcF | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.0% | 2.0% | 6.6% | 9.8% | 21.5% | |
| Percent Increases (Sewer) | FY14 | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | 10 Year | 19 Year | ||
| Block 1 | 0 – 40 CcF | 4.2% | 5.3% | 6.8% | 3.1% | 7.7% | 7.5% | 7.0% | 6.3% | 8.0% | 8.0% | 5.1% | 87.3% | 176.9% | |
| Block 2 | 41 – 400 CcF | 4.2% | 5.2% | 6.8% | 3.2% | 7.7% | 7.5% | 7.0% | 6.3% | 8.0% | 8.0% | 5.1% | 87.0% | 176.1% | |
| Block 3 | 401 – 2,000 CcF | 4.3% | 5.2% | 6.8% | 3.2% | 7.7% | 7.5% | 7.0% | 6.3% | 8.0% | 8.0% | 5.1% | 87.1% | 176.5% | |
| Block 4 | 2,001 – 10,000 CcF | 4.2% | 5.2% | 6.8% | 3.2% | 7.7% | 7.5% | 7.0% | 6.3% | 8.0% | 8.0% | 5.1% | 87.1% | 176.1% | |
| Block 5 | Over 10,000 CcF | 4.2% | 5.2% | 6.8% | 3.2% | 7.7% | 7.5% | 7.0% | 6.3% | 8.0% | 8.0% | 5.1% | 87.0% | 176.0% | |
| Percent Increases (Combined) | FY14 | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | 10 Year | 19 Year | ||
| Block 1 | 0 – 40 CcF | 3.0% | 3.8% | 5.1% | 2.4% | 5.8% | 5.8% | 5.5% | 5.0% | 6.6% | 6.9% | 5.4% | 66.5% | 125.6% | |
| Block 2 | 41 – 400 CcF | 3.0% | 3.8% | 5.0% | 2.4% | 5.8% | 5.8% | 5.4% | 5.0% | 6.6% | 6.8% | 5.4% | 65.9% | 124.3% | |
| Block 3 | 401 – 2,000 CcF | 3.1% | 3.8% | 5.1% | 2.4% | 5.8% | 5.8% | 5.5% | 5.0% | 6.6% | 6.9% | 5.4% | 66.2% | 125.2% | |
| Block 4 | 2,001 – 10,000 CcF | 3.0% | 3.8% | 5.1% | 2.4% | 5.8% | 5.8% | 5.5% | 5.0% | 6.6% | 6.9% | 5.4% | 66.5% | 125.3% | |
| Block 5 | Over 10,000 CcF | 3.0% | 3.8% | 5.0% | 2.4% | 5.8% | 5.8% | 5.5% | 5.0% | 6.6% | 6.9% | 5.4% | 66.1% | 124.8% | |
*All rates are per CcF. CcF is an abbreviation of 100 cubic feet. One CcF is approximately 750 gallons
Manager’s Agenda #7. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the appointments and reappointments of Danielle Jones-McLaughlin, Deepti Nijhawan, Loring Brinckerhoff, Avril dePagter, Mary Devlin , Dan Stubbs as members of the Cambridge Commission for Persons with Disabilities (CCPD).
Appointments Approved 9-0
Manager’s Agenda #8. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the Salvation Army Shelter and Daytime Program.
pulled by Zondervan; comments by QZ, MM, PT; responses by Yi-An Huang, Ellen Semonoff (annual cost $1,080,000); Placed on File 9-0
Manager’s Agenda #9. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to PO23#35, related to the Allocation Plan for Cambridge’s HOME-ARP funds.
pulled by Nolan; comments by PN, QZ, MM, DC, SS; responses by Yi-An Huang, Iram Farooq; Placed on File 9-0
Manager’s Agenda #10. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to a summary of a Planning Board Meeting on the 2022 Town-Gown Reports and Presentations.
pulled by Carlone; comments by DC (graduate student housing, etc.), PN; Placed on File 9-0
Manager’s Agenda #11. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the final report for the City’s comprehensive year-long municipal broadband feasibility study.
Placed on File 9-0
I am eager to be convinced that this is a worthwhile investment that won’t jeopardize the City’s financial standing. The $194 million estimate is almost certainly less that what the actual cost will be. I also have a lot of questions about what this initiative would mean in terms of residents who have their Internet, Cable TV, and phone bundled into a single Comcast package. For example, will a resident still have to contract with Comcast if they want to watch TV? Will the result actually be cost savings or additional cost? Will Cable TV simply dry up and blow away in a few years with everything shifting toward data-intensive streaming options? Even more fundamentally, were any of these questions raised in the supposedly “scientific survey” now being touted by some councillors in their pre-campaign email blasts?
Manager’s Agenda #12. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to PO23#44, related to the Barrett, et al., Zoning Petition. [text of report]
Referred to Petition 9-0
Unfinished Business #3. An Ordinance has been received from Diane P. LeBlanc City Clerk, relative to a Zoning Petition from Patrick Barrett et al. North Mass Ave BA-5 Zoning District Petition (Ordinance #2022-21). [Passed to 2nd Reading, Mar 6, 2023; To Be Ordained on or after Mar 20, 2023; Expires Apr 3, 2023]
Charter Right #2. That the City Manager is requested to confer with the appropriate City departments to ensure multi-family properties on the market are reviewed as quickly as possible as potential affordable housing acquisitions. [Charter Right – Simmons, Mar 6, 2023]
Remarks by Simmons, Nolan; Amendments Adopted 9-0; Order Adopted as Amended 9-0
I don’t wish to infuriate anyone by saying this, but the notion that multi-family buildings, particularly two- and three-family buildings, should be removed from private ownership flies in the face of the reality that small property owners have been possibly the greatest source of affordable rents in Cambridge for well over a century. A nonprofit corporation is not an improvement over a good landlord or landlady and these properties have long been an essential part of securing a middle class of Cambridge residents.
Unfinished Business #4. An Ordinance has been received from Diane P. LeBlanc, relative to Ordinance # 2022-6 Article III Green Jobs 2.66.100 Definitions. [Passed to 2nd Reading, Feb 27, 2023; To Be Ordained on or after Mar 20, 2023]
pulled by Zondervan; Ordained 9-0
Applications & Petitions #1. A Zoning Petition Has been received from Charles Jessup Franklin et al., regarding allowing new construction that is similar in size and shape as existing buildings for the purpose of promoting housing and first floor retail.
pulled by McGovern; comments by MM, BA (not enthusiastic, wants even higher density); Referred to Planning Board and Ordinance Committee 8-0-0-1 (Carlone – Present)
Perhaps we should call this latest variation the Missing Middle Revisited Petition. Variations on this theme by the densifiers seem endless. The suggested residential densities in this variant are in many ways even greater than those proposed in the previous “Missing Middle” attempt – and continue to be be somewhat oblivious to how housing on Cambridge streets actually functions. [Ref.: “A few observations on density”]
Applications & Petitions #2. A Zoning Petition Has been received from Michael Monestime et al. regarding Outdoor Use Zoning Petition for the Central Square Cultural District.
pulled by McGovern; comments by MM, QZ, PT, PN, DS; Referred to Planning Board and Ordinance Committee 9-0
Order #4. That the City Manager work with the Central Square Business Improvement District and provide a license agreement, as well as direct financial and regulatory support for the continued and uninterrupted operation of Starlight Square. Mayor Siddiqui, Vice Mayor Mallon, Councillor McGovern, Councillor Simmons, Councillor Zondervan, Councillor Carlone, Councillor Azeem, Councillor Toner, Councillor Nolan
pulled by Siddiqui; remarks by Siddiqui, Simmons, McGovern, Nolan, Zondervan, Carlone (consider redevelopment of the edges as well), Azeem, Mallon; Order Adopted as Amended 9-0
I greatly appreciate that we had Starlight Square during the pandemic, and I absolutely hope that we can have a suitable venue like this in the future. That said, Starlight Square as it is now is something of a relic that would need either a substantial upgrade or a relocation. Many of us view it as an experiment that strongly made the case for comparable and perhaps much better options in the future. Central Square needs options for vendors such as those provided by Popportunity, and we definitely need better gathering spaces for events or a rethinking of existing spaces. Dumping on the BZA (as some councillors are doing) is more of a cheap shot than an actual plan that can be sustained.
Resolution #1. Congratulations to Sara Reese on receiving the 2023 Exemplary School Champion Award for her leadership in workforce development in Cambridge. Councillor Toner
Resolution #2. Gratitude to Margaret Drury for her many years of tireless service to the Cambridge Redevelopment Authority and to the City of Cambridge. Councillor Simmons, Vice Mayor Mallon, Mayor Siddiqui, Councillor Toner, Councillor Zondervan, Councillor Azeem, Councillor Carlone, Councillor McGovern, Councillor Nolan
pulled by Simmons (notes Margaret’s three decades of service to the City); remarks by McGovern, Carlone; Adopted as Amended 9-0
Order #2. That the Executive Assistant to the City Council is requested to confer with the Dedication Committee to consider the request to dedicate a street corner in honor of Ned Handy. Councillor Carlone, Councillor Toner
pulled by Carlone; remarks by Carlone; Order Adopted 9-0
Order #1. That the City Council go on record supporting Enabling Legislation for a Real Estate Transfer Fee. Councillor Carlone, Mayor Siddiqui, Vice Mayor Mallon, Councillor Nolan
pulled by Carlone; remarks by Carlone (would generate $23 million more per year for affordable housing); Order Adopted 9-0
Order #3. Policy Order for Garden Street Accommodations. Councillor Toner, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Simmons, Councillor Carlone
pulled by Zondervan; remarks by Toner; notable that there were many nearly identical comments during Public Comment from the “bike lobby” opposing this Order; Charter Right – Zondervan
This is a start – and hopefully not just ass-covering for some city councillors concerned about how West Cambridge residents might vote in November. Ensuring bicycle safety need not be a monolithic enterprise with little room for revision.
Committee Report #1. The Finance Committee met on May 7, 2019. [text of report]
pulled by McGovern; Reported Accepted as Amended, Placed on File 9-0
Committee Report #2. The Finance Committee met on Feb 16, 2022 to consider the City Council goals in relation to the budget and to gather input and discuss priorities on the FY23 budget. [text of report]
Reported Accepted, Placed on File 9-0
Committee Report #3. The Finance Committee met on Feb 23, 2022 to reconvene its Feb 16, 2020 meeting to receive public comment regarding the City Council goals in relation to the budget and to gather input and discuss priorities on the FY23 budget. [text of report]
Reported Accepted, Placed on File 9-0
Committee Report #4. The Finance Committee met on Apr 20, 2022 to discuss the city’s ARPA application/funding update status. [text of report]
Reported Accepted, Placed on File 9-0
Committee Report #5. The Finance Committee met on May 10, 2022 to conduct hearing on FY 2023 budget. [text of report]
Reported Accepted, Placed on File 9-0
Committee Report #6. The Finance Committee met on May 11, 2022 to conduct hearing on FY 2023 school budget. [text of report]
Reported Accepted, Placed on File 9-0
Committee Report #7. The Finance Committee met on May 17, 2022 to conduct hearing on FY 2023 budget. [text of report]
Reported Accepted, Placed on File 9-0
Committee Report #8. The Finance Committee held a public hearing on June 14, 2022 to receive an update on ARPA funding. [text of report]
Reported Accepted, Placed on File 9-0
Committee Report #9. The Human Services and Veterans Committee held a public meeting on Feb 28, 2023, to discuss the status of after school programming in Cambridge. [text of report]
Reported Accepted, Placed on File 9-0
Perhaps Neil Sedaka should provide the soundtrack with “Catching Up Is Hard To Do”. My favorite case is the (March 6) adoption of the ordinance establishing the procedure for appointment of the Charter Review Commission as required by the Charter amendments adopted in 2021. The committee was appointed July 1, 2022 – more than 8 months prior to the adoption of the ordinance. – Robert Winters
Heart seems very well equipped… to deposit their funding.
Thanks for the update on the campers. It’s a good reminder that the city shouldn’t over accommodate homeless, and Boston Harbor is an unexpected answer to the see clicker that asked ‘where should they go?’
Comment by George Stylianopoulos — March 23, 2023 @ 8:11 am