Cambridge Civic Journal Forum

January 6, 2026

Cambridge InsideOut Episodes 657-658: January 6, 2026

Episode 657 – Cambridge InsideOut: Jan 6, 2026 (Part 1)

This episode was broadcast on Jan 6, 2026 at 6:00pm. Topics: 2026 City Council and School Committee Inaugurations; Election of Mayor Siddiqui, Vice Mayor Azeem, School Committee Chair David Weinstein and Vice Chair Caitlin Dube; Intrigue with the School Committee votes, adoption of the Rules, and the role of the Cambridge Education Association (CEA); personal note on the passing of friends – Robert Devaney and Andy Engelward; a few words on the local press, Cambridge Day, and Marc Levy. Host: Robert Winters [On YouTube] [audio]


Episode 658 – Cambridge InsideOut: Jan 6, 2026 (Part 2)

This episode was broadcast on Jan 6, 2026 at 6:30pm. Topics: Inclusionary Zoning – 1998 vs. today, legal challenge, nexus study, the politics, ramifications of the multi-family zoning changes to the Zoning Ordinance; public – Inclusionary – subsidized -government – affordable housing and now “social housing” – it’s really all the same except for eligibility; what is the “sweet spot” for percentage of subsidized housing that is fiscally sustainable? (currently at 15.3%); changes in voter turnout by age from 2023 to 2025; campaign finance facts and figures for the 2025 municipal election; upzoning along N. Mass. Ave., Cambridge Street, and what may be coming next for Central Square and elsewhere. Host: Robert Winters [On YouTube] [audio]

[Materials used in these episodes]

December 22, 2025

Wheeling and Dealing – December 22, 2025 Cambridge City Council meeting

Wheeling and Dealing – December 22, 2025 Cambridge City Council meeting

That's All Folks!While backroom deals are being cut to see whether Councillors McGovern or Siddiqui (or someone else) can garner the necessary majorities for who will be the next Mayor (and Vice Mayor), the curtain closes tonight on the 2024-2025 City Council. Even though the controversial super-upzonings of Cambridge Street and Mass. Ave. don’t expire until January 28, the rush is on to ram them through now to prevent any uncertainty that might arise with the election of two new city councillors. They’re even trading token amounts of permissible building heights in exchange for possible mayoral and vice mayoral votes. For what it’s worth, the jockeying for who might be the Chair of the School Committee under the rules of the new Charter is even more bizarre – with the teacher’s union wielding an obscene degree of influence.

I’m pretty sure the next two years are going to suck. Good thing I’m now streaming Turner Classic Movies because I will be needing a lot of Fred Astaire, Cyd Charisse, Leslie Caron, Katherine Hepburn, and Barbara Stanwyck to get through the next two years.

Here are the items on this week’s agenda prior to the curtain coming down:

Manager’s Agenda #1. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to a federal update including an update on relevant court cases. [text of report]
pulled by Siddiqui; comments by City Manager Yi-An Huang, Siddiqui, Nolan, City Solicitor Megan Bayer; Placed on File 9-0

Manager’s Agenda #3. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the appointment of the following members to the Board of Zoning Appeal (BZA) effective Dec 22, 2025. [text of report]
Appointments Confirmed 8-0-1 (Simmons – Absent)

Manager’s Agenda #5. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to combined sewer overflows. [text of report]
pulled by Nolan; comments by Nolan, John Nardone, Jim Wilcox (City Engineer, DPW), Toner, Zusy; Placed on File 9-0

I can never get enough information about infrastructure.


Supersize It – Regardless of the Consequences

Manager’s Agenda #6. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to a revised Massachusetts Avenue zoning petition. [CDD memo (this is for Cambridge St.)]
pulled by McGovern; comments by McGovern; Unfinished Business #3 and Charter Right #1 brought forward 9-0; McGovern – amend petition by substitution 9-0; comments by Toner, Siddiqui, Nolan (favors reduction to 11 stories, has concerns about what might happen in Inclusionary Zoning (IZ) thrown out); Megan Bayer notes if IZ thrown out then Zoning Ordinance could be amended to grant extra height/density in exchange for affordable units; comments by Zusy (favors reduction to 11 stories, quotes Hindu scripture Bhagavad Gita – inaction is often the best action, also notes other recent upzonings done in rapid succession), Sobrinho-Wheeler (opposed to all reductions, continues to believe that this will yield affordable housing), Azeem (says a Special Permit will still be needed for larger developments), Wilson (need to be making extremely bold decisions), Melissa Peters (CDD), Jeff Roberts (CDD); McGovern asks about 11 vs. 12 stories; Melissa Peters, Yi-An Huang strongly favor 12 stories; McGovern justifies more height even for relatively few “affordable” units, continues to quote the Envision housing goals (made up by CDD after the fact), opposed to any height reduction; comments by Nolan re: new construction methods that less tall buildings more economically viable; comments by Zusy in favor of 11 stories, suggests that proposed zoning will make housing less affordable for those supporting the upzoning, suggests Central Square a better place for the additional height, petition needs more refinement; Wilson notes that we cannot build ourselves out of this housing crisis and that this upzoning will not yield any actual affordability; Charter Right #1 initially Passes 5-4 (PN,SS,AW,CZ,DS – Yes; BA,MM,JSW,PT – No); discussion re: substitute language; Simmons changes vote to No, so Charter Right #1 Fails 4-5 (PN,SS,AW,CZ – Yes; BA,MM,JSW,PT,DS – No); Ordained as Amended 6-3 (PN,AW,CZ – No); Reconsideration Fails 0-9; Placed on File 9-0
Due to error in posted agenda (as noted – Cambridge St. language was posted instead of Mass Ave language), Rules Suspended (hoping the same does prevail) 9-0; Reconsideration Prevails 9-0; Jeff Roberts (CDD) notes typos needed to be corrected in 17.805 (not 17.705); Petition Amended by Substitution 9-0; Petition Re-Ordained as Amended 6-3 (PN,AW,CZ – No); Reconsideration Fails 0-9

Charter Right #1. That the City Manager is requested to instruct the Community Development Department to reduce the recommendations for the Massachusetts Avenue subdistrict (MAS-12) from a maximum of 12 stories to 11 stories with ground floor active use/retail as consistent with the recommendation of the Mass Ave Planning Study. [Charter Right – Siddiqui, Dec 15, 2025]
Brought forward along with Manager’s Agenda #6; initially Passes 5-4 (PN,SS,AW,CZ,DS – Yes; BA,MM,JSW,PT – No); discussion re: substitute language; Simmons changes vote to No, so Charter Right #1 Fails 4-5 (PN,SS,AW,CZ – Yes; BA,MM,JSW,PT,DS – No)

Unfinished Business #3. An Ordinance has been received from Interim City Clerk Paula M. Crane, relative to amend the Zoning Map and Articles 2.000, 3.000, 4.000, 5.000, 6.000, 11.000 17.000, and 20.000 of the Cambridge Zoning Ordinance as follows with the intent of establishing four new zoning districts for the Massachusetts Avenue corridor. [Passed to 2nd Reading, Dec 8, 2025; Eligible to be Ordained Dec 22, 2025; Expires Jan 28, 2026] [Revised][Published]
Brought forward along with Manager’s Agenda #6; Ordained as Amended 6-3 (PN,AW,CZ – No)
Due to error in posted agenda (as noted – Cambridge St. language was posted instead of Mass Ave language), Rules Suspended (hoping the same does prevail) 9-0; Reconsideration Prevails 9-0; Jeff Roberts (CDD) notes typos needed to be corrected in 17.805 (not 17.705); Petition Amended by Substitution 9-0; Petition Re-Ordained as Amended 6-3 (PN,AW,CZ – No); Reconsideration Fails 0-9

Manager’s Agenda #7. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to a revised Cambridge Street zoning petition. [CDD memo] [Revised Cambridge St Petition (Markup)][Revised Cambridge St Petition (Clean)][Revised Cambridge St Map][Revised Cambridge St Map Descriptions][Combined Mass Ave/Cambridge St. amendments (Markup)][Combined Mass Ave/Cambridge St. amendments (Clean)]
pulled by McGovern; Unfinished Business #4 brought forward 9-0; comments by Sobrinho-Wheeler, Nolan in favor of delaying this; comments by Toner, Simmons in favor of voting now; Unf. Business #4 Tabled 7-2 (PT,DS – No); Placed on File 9-0

Unfinished Business #4. An Ordinance has been received from Interim City Clerk Paula M. Crane, relative to amend the Zoning Map and Articles 3.000, 17.000, and 19.000 of the Cambridge Zoning Ordinance as follows with the intent of establishing four new zoning districts for the Cambridge Street corridor. [Passed to 2nd Reading, Dec 8, 2025; Eligible to be Ordained Dec 22, 2025; Expires Jan 28, 2026] [Revised][Published]
Brought forward along with Manager’s Agenda #7; Tabled 7-2 (PT,DS – No)

Communications #45. Nonie Valentine, re: Pause on extreme upzoning on Mass. Ave. and Cambridge St.

I’m with Nonie on this one. We can do so much better, but that would require much better local representation than we currently have or will have in the near future.


Order #1. That the City Manager works with the Government Operations and Civic Unity Committee to hold hearings to discuss new ideas to honor and remember individuals (i.e. communal memorial garden, wall or path), criteria for eligibility, a committee structure with diverse representation of the city residents, and a means for recording and maintaining our current and future memorials.   Councillor Toner, Mayor Simmons, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Zusy
Comments by Nolan, Simmons; Charter Right – Simmons

Order #2. Restricting Eligibility for On-Street Resident Parking Permits in New Transit-Oriented Developments.   Councillor Zusy, Councillor Azeem, Councillor Nolan
Charter Right – Simmons

This is not a new proposal. The response from the City Solicitor has always (correctly) been that this is not a legal restriction that can be imposed by the City, though a property owner may be able to make this a requirement in a lease. That said, I am told that Somerville has imposed such a restriction, but I suppose that will last right up until the point that someone takes it to court.

Resolution #4. Congratulations to Kathleen Rawlins on her retirement from the Historical Commission.   Councillor Toner, Mayor Simmons

Kit Rawlins has been a welcome presence with the Historical Commission for many years, and I wish her the happiest possible retirement.

Resolution #9. Congratulations to Patrol Officer Devon Brooks on his retirement from the Cambridge Police Department.   Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Mayor Simmons

I have for years regularly bicycled alongside Devon on the semi-annual bike rides organized by the Cambridge Bicycle Committee, and I often encountered him while on duty. Like so many others in the Cambridge Police Department, Devon has consistently demonstrated how fortunate we are to have such a caring, effective, and good-natured local police force.

Note: The meeting ended with a personal statement by exiting Councillor Toner thanking family, friends, colleagues, and City staff. Mayor Simmons closed with an acknowledgment of Councillor Toner’s exemplary service. This was the last regular meeting for departing Councillors Paul Toner and Ayesha Wilson.

November 25, 2025

Short and Curious – November 24, 2025 Cambridge City Council meeting

Short and Curious – November 24, 2025 Cambridge City Council meeting

Though the agenda is short and uneventful, I suspect the personnel shakeup reported in the Harvard Crimson is liable to generate some conversation as it relates to On The Table #2. Here goes:City Hall

Manager’s Agenda #1. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 25-60, which requested a comprehensive report on Gold Star Mothers Memorial Park. [text of report]
pulled by Zusy; comments by Zusy, Sobrinho-Wheeler, DPW Commissioner John Nardone, Nolan; [Kevin Beutel, Health Commissioner Sam Lipson also in attendance]; Placed on File 9-0

Manager’s Agenda #2. Transmitting Communication from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the appropriation of $1,000,000, from Free Cash to the Public Investment Fund Public Works Department Extraordinary Expenditures account. These funds will support the removal of stockpiled contaminated soil and initiate the design phase for the remediation and reconstruction of Gold Star Mothers Park. [text of report]
pulled by Zusy; comments by Zusy, John Nardone, Deputy City Manager Kathy Watkins, City Manager Yi-An Huang; Order Adopted 9-0

Manager’s Agenda #3. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 25-56, regarding an update on rodent control citywide. [text of report]
pulled by Nolan; comments by Nolan, John Nardone, Rat Czar Dave Powers (Inspectional Services), Sam Lipson, Wilson, Yi-An Huang, Simmons; Anthony Tuccinardi (Inspectional Services), Toner (on coyotes); Placed on File 9-0


On The Table #2. That the City Manager is requested to explore with the Government Operations Committee whether the functions of the Peace Commission may be improved and enhanced by bringing them within another City Commission or Department, such as the Human Rights Commission, and report back in a timely manner. [Charter Right – Simmons, May 19, 2025; Tabled June 2, 2025] (PO25#76)

Late Order #2. Update on Organizational Changes to the Equity & Inclusion Department.   Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Wilson, Vice Mayor McGovern
taken up early; comments by Wilson, Nolan, Azeem, Raecia Catchings (“Chief People Officer”), Sobrinho-Wheeler (who expresses desire that City Council should have control over City personnel matters), Siddiqui, Toner, Simmons, City Solicitor Megan Bayer (raises issue of whether any of this qualifies for possible Executive Session), McGovern; remarks by City Manager Yi-An Huang on how this action came about, accountability, investments in “equity and inclusion” – defers responses to subordinates; Deidre Travis Brown (Chief of Equity and Inclusion) on duplication of effort among commissions, efficiency and effectiveness; Rae Catchings (on the “runway needed” for future actions); Zusy, Siddiqui, McGovern (wants to be added as sponsor), Nolan, Wilson, Yi-An Huang (on future restructuring and staffing changes); amendment to add McGovern and one line adopted 8-0-1 (Azeem Absent); comments by Simmons, Zusy; Order Adopted as Amended 5-3-1 (Toner, Zusy, Simmons – No; Azeem – Absent)


Committee Report #1. The Health and Environment Committee held a public hearing on Wed, Oct 29, 2025 to review and discuss energy planning in Cambridge including expanding electricity capacity, expanding renewable energy productions, BEUDO energy requirements, and thermal energy network planning and any other topics relevant to the city’s overall planning for ensuring city goals of electrification may be met. [text of report]
Report Accepted, Placed on File 7-2-0 (Azeem, Siddiqui – Absent)

November 19, 2025

Cambridge InsideOut Episodes 655-656: November 18, 2025

Episode 655 – Cambridge InsideOut: Nov 18, 2025 (Part 1)

This episode was broadcast on Nov 18, 2025 at 6:00pm. Topics: 2025 Municipal Election – error, test ballots, controversy, preliminary, unofficial, official results; alphabetical bias in Ranked Choice Voting; Round-by-Round City Council results; School Committee, Teachers Union (CEA) slate and disinterested voters; Factions and Slates; Mamdani Effect. Host: Robert Winters [On YouTube] [audio]


Episode 656 – Cambridge InsideOut: Nov 18, 2025 (Part 2)

This episode was broadcast on Nov 18, 2025 at 6:30pm. Topics: 2025 Municipal Election – Round-by-Round School Committee results; ballot data, configuration files, ChoicePlusPro tabulation; new City Charter approved – Election Commission flexibility, School Committee to choose their own Chair; Replacements in the event of a vacancy; Instant Runoff Mayoral and School Committee Chair simulations; #1 votes distributions by ward/precinct; #2 votes distributions behind each candidates #1 votes; What might we expect in the new year? Host: Robert Winters [On YouTube] [audio]

[Materials used in these episodes]

November 16, 2025

2025 Cambridge Final Election Results (and some curiosities)

Official Results (Fri, Nov 14):
City Council
(in order of election):
Sumbul Siddiqui
Marc C. McGovern
Ayah Al-Zubi
Cathie Zusy
Burhan Azeem
Jivan G. Sobrinho-Wheeler
Tim Flaherty
E. Denise Simmons
Patricia M. Nolan
Official Results (Fri, Nov 14):
School Committee
(in order of election):
Elizabeth Hudson
Richard Harding
Luisa De Paula Santos
Caitlin Dube
Arjun Jaikumar
David Weinstein
Charter Ballot Question:
Yes:  18,414 (73%)
No:     5,899 (23%)
Blank: 1,039 (4%)
Total: 25,352 (100%)
Round-by-Round Results (HTML) – official City version Round-by-Round Results (HTML) – official City version  
Spreadsheet (PDF) – with transfer details Spreadsheet (PDF) – with transfer details  
City Council #1 Votes by Ward/Precinct School Committee #1 Votes by Ward/Precinct  
City Council #2 Vote Distribution School Committee #2 Vote Distribution  
Replacements (should a vacancy occur in the upcoming 2026-2027 term):
City Council:
Al-Zubi –> Rifkin
Azeem –> Bullister
Flaherty –> Hanratty
McGovern –> Bullister
Nolan –> Bullister
Siddiqui –> Wilson
Simmons –> Wilson
Sobrinho-Wheeler –> Bullister
Zusy –> Hanratty
School Committee:
De Paula Santos –> Havstad
Dube –> Goetz
Harding –> Hunter
Hudson –> Schraa Huh
Jaikumar –> Goetz
Weinstein –> Rojas Villarreal
What would happen if we used this year’s City Council and School Committee ballots in a Runoff to determine the Chair of each?
Instant Mayor:
Count 7: McGovern 8377, Siddiqui 8012; Zusy 5748
Count 8: McGovern 9330, Siddiqui 8786
Instant School Committee Chair:
Count 4: Hudson 6690, de Paula Santos 6674, Harding 5693
Count 5: Hudson 9526, dePaula Santos 7226

November 7, 2025

Unofficial Cambridge Election Results (Nov 7, 2025)

Filed under: 2025 election,Cambridge,Charter,City Council,elections,School Committee — Robert Winters @ 8:27 pm

School Committee Unofficial Election Reversal

Nov 7, 2025 – The Unofficial Election Results have now been determined. Due to an error in which the ballot data from a test deck of ballots was not cleared prior to the tabulation of the actual City Council and School Committee votes, the Preliminary Results (Nov 4) contained significant errors. In the newly tabulated Unofficial Election Results, David Weinstein is unofficially reelected to the School Committee and Eugenia Schraa Huh is not elected. The unofficial winners in the City Council race are the same – though the order of election has changed.

Unofficial Results (Fri, Nov 7):
City Council
(in order of election):
Sumbul Siddiqui
Marc C. McGovern
Ayah Al-Zubi
Cathie Zusy
Burhan Azeem
Jivan G. Sobrinho-Wheeler
Tim Flaherty
E. Denise Simmons
Patricia M. Nolan
Unofficial Results (Fri, Nov 7):
School Committee
(in order of election):
Elizabeth Hudson
Richard Harding
Luisa De Paula Santos
Caitlin Dube
Arjun Jaikumar
David Weinstein
Charter Ballot Question:
Yes:  18,406 (73%)
No:     5,899 (23%)
Blank: 1,046 (4%)
Round-by-Round Results (HTML) – official City version Round-by-Round Results (HTML) – official City version  
Spreadsheet (PDF) – with transfer details Spreadsheet (PDF) – with transfer details  
Note: The Final Official Election Results will be determined on Friday, November 14. – RW

Election Commission Statement Regarding Cambridge Municipal Election Preliminary Unofficial Results From November 4th
The Cambridge Election Commission conducts rigorous and mandatory prequalified testing for every election. Through its proactive auditing process, the Election Commission determined that ballots used for testing were not fully cleared from the Election Management System by the vendor in advance of the Municipal Election on November 4, 2025.

As a result, the preliminary unofficial results for the 2025 Municipal Election that were released early November 5 included both the ballots processed election night and the test ballots, which produced 2,158 additional records (632 for the City Council, 1,370 for the School Committee, and 156 for the Ballot Question).

The Election Commission has since removed all test ballots and retabulated the unofficial election results, which also now includes ballots counted Wednesday, November 5 through Friday, November 7.

With the updated Count-by-Count Unofficial results and the removal of the test ballots, there has been a change in the announced candidates from Friday’s School Committee unofficial results versus what was originally announced as part of the unofficial preliminary results late Tuesday night. There have been no changes to the named candidates in the City Council unofficial results or the yes vote in support of the ballot question.

Preliminary unofficial results are made available by the Election Commission to the community, media organizations, and other interested individuals as soon as they are available on Election Night. However, results are subject to change as additional ballots are counted and tallies are confirmed through a series of checks and balances. As a result of this thorough auditing process, a discrepancy associated with the test ballots was discovered.

November 5, 2025

Preliminary Cambridge Election Results (Nov 4, 2025)

Preliminary Results (Tues, Nov 4):
City Council
(in order of election):
Marc C. McGovern
Sumbul Siddiqui
Ayah Al-Zubi
Burhan Azeem
Jivan G. Sobrinho-Wheeler
E. Denise Simmons
Tim Flaherty
Cathie Zusy
Patricia M. Nolan
Preliminary Results (Tues, Nov 4):
School Committee
(in order of election):
Elizabeth Hudson
Richard Harding
Luisa De Paula Santos
Caitlin Dube
Arjun Jaikumar
Eugenia Schraa Huh
Charter Ballot Question:
Yes: 17,930 (75.5%)
No:    5,824 (24.5%)
Round-by-Round Results (PDF) – official City version Round-by-Round Results (PDF) – official City version  
Spreadsheet (PDF) – with transfer details Spreadsheet (PDF) – with transfer details  

October 31, 2025

The Proposed Cambridge City Charter

The Proposed Cambridge City Charter

Oct 31, 2025 – I have been meaning to write up my thoughts on the proposed new Charter, but so many things all at once have been getting in my way. Many people have been asking me about it, so here are some thoughts:Robert Winters

Basically, it will be OK whether or not it passes. Virtually all of the Plan E provisions will remain – albeit it with some language revision and a relatively small number of actual changes.

The bottom line for me was the following:

(a) allow the Election Commission the freedom to approve a tabulation method for the PR Count that is independent of the order in which the ballots are counted;

(b) maintain the city manager form of government;

(c) maintain the practice of the City Council electing its own Chair, i.e. The Mayor;

(d) allow the School Committee to choose its own Chair.

If I had my druthers (which I don’t and I don’t really even know what that word means), I would have:

(a) created a new elected advisory council with representation from all the city’s neighborhoods that could propose legislation to the City Council and require a vote.

(b) rescinded the authority of the City Council to approve board appointments (they actually increased it – bummer)

(c) enhance the citizen petition mechanism to require a City Council vote on the substance of a petition with sufficient signatures.

I was not thrilled with the efforts of some city councillors to gain more power over city management, e.g. the power to approve or deny appointment of City department heads – a surefire way to bring back political patronage. Thankfully we were able to beat back that proposal. I was also quite horrified that some councillors wanted to give themselves the power to reallocate essentially all of the discretionary budget of any City department to other City departments. Again, we were able to beat back that effort. There were other disastrously misguided recommendations from the Charter Review Committee that were thankfully voted down or delayed to another day (or never).

I felt that the entire Charter Review process was flawed from beginning to end. Just as one example, the initial City Council vote was to completely eliminate the citizen right to petition based on the belief that it is already guaranteed in state law. It isn’t. That right was only restored when I convinced a few councillors and the Law Department that the City Council was in error – and they rescinded their prior vote and restored the right to petition.

I plan to vote for the new Charter – not because it’s perfect or what I would ideally want, but because it met my minimum requirements (see above).

Robert

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress