Cambridge Civic Journal Forum

September 6, 2024

Amid Sorrow & Loss, the City Council Reconvenes – Sept 9, 2024 Cambridge City Council meeting

Amid Sorrow & Loss, the City Council Reconvenes – Sept 9, 2024 Cambridge City Council meeting

Joan PickettI can barely find the words to express my sorrow at the loss of my friend, City Councillor Joan Pickett. Nonetheless, amidst sorrow and loss, the Cambridge City Council will reconvene this Monday after their Summer Recess. The Vacancy Recount will take place on Thursday, Sept 19 and Cathie Zusy is expected to join the City Council and be sworn in on Monday, Sept 23.

Resolution #6. Condolences to the family of City Councillor Joan Pickett.  Mayor Simmons, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Toner, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Azeem, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Wilson
Adopted as Amended 8-0

I am grateful to Mayor Simmons for shedding a little light on what happened to my friend Joan Pickett – especially her note of appreciation to Naomie Stephen, Paula Crane, and Ayesha Wilson who were with Joan when she took ill last month. More details and memorial plans will follow later this month.

Mayor Simmons emphasized how Joan tried to build bridges between people of differing points of view. Councillors Siddiqui and Wilson were tearful in their remarks about Joan. Councillor Wilson noted the toll that mean-spirited email messages (and more) can have on elected officials, including Joan, and of how she will miss Joan’s kindness, generosity, and grace. Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler and Mayor Simmons also noted Joan’s warmth and sense of humor.

Two quotes, in particular, stood out in the discussion around Joan’s death. Naomie Stephen said, “Cambridge needs more Joans.” Mayor Simmons suggested she may in the future use the acronym WWJPD in future City Council deliberations: “What would Joan Pickett do?”

Mayor Simmons rounded out the discussion with a modified version of the short poem “Outwitted” by Edwin Markham (1852-1940):

He drew a circle that shut me out
Heretic, a rebel, a thing to flout.
But Love and Joan had the wit to win:
We drew a circle that took him in!


Here are the agenda items I found most interesting and/or important on this week’s agenda:

Reconsideration #1. Requiring a 2/3rds vote for approving changes to be forwarded to the legislature and the voters on a future ballot. (PO24#102) [Filed by Councillor Toner who was not on the prevailing side of that vote, and who intends to move suspension of the rules to allow this motion for Reconsideration]
Rules Suspended 8-0; Reconsideration Prevails 8-0; Tabled 8-0

I hope that the majority of city councillors will extend the same courtesy to allow reconsideration of this vote as they extended to Councillor Wilson on Aug 5 when they allowed her to change her vote at the end of that meeting. Since there will not be a full City Council until Sept 23, the best course of action would be to suspend the rules to allow Reconsideration and to then lay this matter On the Table until at least Sept 23.


Manager’s Agenda #2. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the appointment of Irene Monroe to the Cambridge Library Board of Trustees.
Appointments Approved 8-0

Manager’s Agenda #3. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the appointment of Avanti Tilak to the Open Data Review Board for a term of two-years.
Appointment Approved 8-0

Manager’s Agenda #8. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the appointments and reappointments of the following persons to the Family Policy Council; Appointments: Interim Superintendent David Murphy. Reappointments: Tina Alu, Michael Johnston, Michelle Lower, Geeta Pradhan, Bridget Rodriguez, Elizabeth Stapleton (formerly Elizabeth Hill), Tagesech Wabeto.
Appointments Approved 8-0

Manager’s Agenda #14. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the reappointments of David Lyons and Elysse Magnotto-Cleary and the appointments of Khyati Saraf and Lorie Graham as Members of the Conservation Commission for a term of three-years. As well as the appointment of Jim Gerstle and Sean Bedingfield as Associate Members of the Conservation Commission for a term of one year.
Appointments Approved 8-0

There have been MANY appointments and invitations to Boards & Commissions lately. In addition to these four appointments, there are several more pending and another eight invitations with September deadlines.


Manager’s Agenda #7. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to a report detailing the Board of Zoning Appeal’s proposed modifications to the Zoning Ordinance, specifically concerning the implementation of dormer guidelines. [text of report]
Petition Referred to Ordinance Committee and Planning Board 8-0

Manager’s Agenda #16. Transmitting Communication from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the appropriation of $416,991, received from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) to the Grant Fund Public Works Extraordinary Expenditures account to support the purchase of an all-electric rubbish packer.
Order Adopted 8-0

This should warm the heart of Councillor Nolan who is almost guaranteed to speak to this matter (she didn’t).

Manager’s Agenda #18. Transmitting Communication from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the appropriation of $276,800, received from the Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy & Environmental Affairs through the Municipal Vulnerability Preparedness (MVP) Program to the Grant Fund Public Works Department Other Ordinary Maintenance account. This grant will focus on increasing urban trees, create a map of high and low tree mortality areas across the Mystic River Watershed, and establish a regional urban forests working group of municipal tree wardens to develop strategies to maximize the likelihood of urban trees growing to maturity and identify priority areas where environmental justice communities live, travel and go to cool off during hot summers.
Order Adopted 8-0

Manager’s Agenda #19. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 24-08, regarding recommendations for the refinement and improvement of the housing permitting process. [text of report]
pulled by Nolan; comments by Nolan, City Manager Yi-An Huang; Iram Farooq (CDD); Kathy Watkins (DPW); Jacob Lazzara (ISD); Deputy City Manager Owen O’Riordan; Vice-Mayor McGovern; Councillors Sobrinho-Wheeler, Azeem; Brooke McKenna (TPT); Councillors Wilson, Toner; Placed on File 8-0


Manager’s Agenda #22. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to extending the prior authorization for the City Manager or their designee to grant street obstruction approvals, along with any other necessary approvals for temporary obstructions until June 30, 2025. (CM24#197) [text of report]
pulled by Nolan; comments by City Solicitor Megan Bayer (explains how authority of Council on street obstructions for outdoor patios delegated to City Manager, desire to make this permanent), Owen O’Riordan; Order Adopted 8-0

It has become routine since the onset of Covid to extend the authorization for outdoor patios for restaurants. Eventually, since these seem to be popular and have helped some restaurants to thrive, some reconfiguration of the streets and sidewalks may be in order so that these may be better configured permanently.


Order #5. That the City Manager is requested to direct the appropriate City staff to enact policy that will extend the priority period for Social Equity and Equity Empowerment cannabis business applicants for a period of six months to one year, or until guidance has been received from the Cannabis Control Commission.  Mayor Simmons, Councillor Toner, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Wilson
pulled by Simmons to add Councillor Wilson as sponsor; Councillor Azeem asks if there is any sense of expiration of this extension; Councillor Siddiqui adds that in addition to extension there are zoning issues to be considered, notes (legal) risks to extending this exemption; Councillor Wilson notes challenges to operators; Councillor Azeem asks for comments from City Solicitor; Megan Bayer notes that preference period in place now for going on 5 years, minor changes/delay in guidance from Cannabis Control Commission, need to balance against interests of medicinal cannabis retailers, exemption period expires Sept 23 (last enacted under “emergency” provisions); Azeem asks of non-equity applicants have gone through process, discomfort with open-ended nature of this process and how exceptional this is [kudos to Azeem for making total sense here]; Toner shares Azeem concerns, but in favor of an extension; Nolan concurs with desire for extension and legal concerns; Bayer notes that preference period is in ordinance and any extension would require an amendment to the ordinance; Simmons, Siddiqui comments; Order Adopted as Amended 7-0-0-1 (Azeem Present)

There must come a point where the City Council’s efforts to override basic economics (and to cater to political friends) has to be called into question and perhaps be challenged in court. One prominent Central Square cannabis retailer that was not been permitted to sell recreational cannabis has already closed while the City continues to grant special status to “social equity” and “equity empowerment” businesses – some of which are funded from some very deep pockets here and elsewhere.


Order #6. That the City Manager direct the Community Development Department (CDD) and the Law Department to draft zoning language based on the proposal discussed at the Housing Committee to eliminate exclusionary zoning and allow up to six stories of multifamily housing in all residential districts.   Councillor Azeem, Councillor Siddiqui
pulled by Toner; Azeem suspension of rules to also take up Committee Report #5, states that median 1BR rent now $3300, 3BR rent now ($5300) [this is very questionable and likely applicable only for new rentals in “luxury” apartments]; Azeem believes that houses destroyed by fire cannot be rebuilt [questionable], believes that this will yield 900 units of affordable housing and that his proposed changes will yield only what he sees as positive outcomes; Charter Right – Toner

Order #7. That the City Manager directs CDD to hold public meetings to inform the Cambridge community about the proposed changes before any public hearings of the Ordinance Committee and the Planning Board on this topic.   Councillor Azeem, Councillor Siddiqui
pulled by Toner; Charter Right – Azeem

Committee Report #5. The Housing Committee held a public hearing on Aug 21, 2024 to continue the discussion on allowing multifamily housing in all neighborhoods of the City. [text of report]
Rules Suspended to consider with Orders #5,6; Report Accepted, Placed on File 8-0

The synopsis here is that most individuals and interest groups are perfectly OK with allowing multifamily housing in all zones (though I wish we could put an end to the “exclusionary zoning” terminology and its associated mythology). The matter of allowing up to six stories (or more) everywhere is far more controversial and highly questionable. I don’t think there are many people who question the need for more housing in Cambridge and elsewhere, but there are better and worse places (economically, architecturally,aesthetically, etc.) for such structures to be allowed and encouraged. Failure to make such distinctions is basically equivalent to dismissing the better intentions of zoning to create a mosaic of neighborhoods with varying features appealing to varying needs and desires. Choice is not a bad thing. I really hope the current Housing Committee is not successful in ramming through such a partisan proposal. It would be far better if our elected officials and CDD staff could be more nuanced in their analysis and perspective.


Order #8. That the City Manager is requested to work with relevant departments to provide a status update on the implementation of the PACE program and provide resources and information for property owners; and provide any recommendations for expanding PACE adoption.   Councillor Nolan, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Toner
pulled by Nolan; comments by Nolan; Order Adopted 8-0

Order #9. That the City Manager is requested to provide an update on progress towards providing a recommendation for changes to the existing ordinance and a report on the impact of the Short-Term Rentals in Cambridge, including how enforcement happens and how many units are registered and available.   Councillor Nolan, Councillor Azeem, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Siddiqui
pulled by Nolan; Nolan expresses concern about loss of apartment rentals due to conversion to Short-Term rentals; Order Adopted 8-0

I would love to hear about the current state of short-term rentals in Cambridge – if it is at all possible to get an accurate assessment.

Order #10. That the City Manager be hereby and is requested to work with relevant staff to provide an update on the status of the Vail Court property and associate litigation in Said S. Abuzahra, Trustee of Equity Realty Trust, et al. v. City of Cambridge, in Executive Session if necessary, at a future meeting.   Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Wilson
Order Adopted 8-0

The saga of this eminent domain taking continues. It has been close to a decade since that property was taken by the City and the derelict buildings demolished. I would love to see this matter settled and, ideally, a partnership with the owners of the abutting parking lot at Bishop Allen and Prospect St. crafted that can create a great mixed use development on the combined lots.

Order #11. That this City Council go on record calling for MIT’s dissociation from the fossil fuel industry in the Climate Project.   Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Nolan
pulled by Sobrinho-Wheeler to add Siddiqui; Order Adopted 7-0-0-1 (Toner Present)

I’ll trust MIT’s judgment on this one.

Order #12. That the City Manager is requested to provide a status Update on Automated Parking Enforcement.   Councillor Nolan, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern
pulled by Nolan; comments by Nolan re: possible legal issues, potential for safety benefits; Order Adopted 8-0

Charter Right #1. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to a Surveillance Technology Impact Report (STIR). [Charter Right – Sobrinho-Wheeler, Aug 5, 2024]
pulled by Sobrinho-Wheeler proposing to Table this; comments by Police Commissioner Christine Elow re: use of surveillance cameras in Central Square; McGovern notes surveillance concerns but that this is for a very specific Central Square purpose, worth a pilot program, not about “criminalizing homelessness”, people now taking advantaged of unhoused individuals and we often know who are committing crimes, but need for building a case; Megan Bayer notes that meeting held with ACLU, intent by CPD to put policies in place; Azeem notes that everyone now has a camera on them, irony that we can’t now have one when we actually need it, victims are often bystanders; Siddiqui wants a timeline for a policy to be established; Elow suggests policy to be developed before cameras activated; Nolan comments on need for policy and examples where cameras would have been helpful, many home cameras already in place and not subject to ordinance; Simmons comments in favor of these cameras; Sobrinho-Wheeler not in favor w/o policy in place; JSW Motion to Table Fails 3-5 (SS,JSW,AW-Yes; BA,MM,PN,PT,DS-No); Order Adopted 7-1 (JSW-No)

Unfinished Business #5. An Ordinance has been received from City Clerk, relative to Tenants Rights 8.71.040.2 Notice by the City, City may publicize and provide information at events/programs about the requirements of Chapter 8.71 more frequently. [Passed to 2nd Reading, Aug 5, 2024; Eligible To Be Ordained]
pulled by McGovern; comments by Nolan re: info to be mailed to tenants; Ordained 8-0

I expect this will be ordained at this meeting – for what it’s worth.


Resolution #5. Condolences to the family of Valerie Corr Hanserd.   Mayor Simmons

Resolution #7. Congratulations to the Honorable Laurence Pierce on his retirement from the Court.   Councillor Toner

Resolution #8. Condolences on the death of Frederick James “Freddie” Cabral.   Councillor Toner


Committee Report #1. The Transportation and Public Utilities Committee held a public hearing on June 25, 2024 to discuss the micromobility memo prepared by Acting City Solicitor Bayer, for updates from the Community Development Department and the Traffic, Parking, and Transportation Department on related topics and to discuss next steps. [text of report]
Report Accepted, Placed on File 8-0

Committee Report #2. The Economic Development and University Relations Committee held a public hearing on Aug 5, 2024 with the City Manager to receive an update on and offer suggestions for consideration in the City’s negotiations with Harvard regarding future Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) agreement. [text of report]
Report Accepted, Placed on File 8-0

Committee Report #3. The Government Operations, Rules, and Claims Committee held a public hearing on Aug 6, 2024 to receive and update from the City Manager on progress in meeting annual goals, as well as the timeline and process for completing this year’s evaluation. In addition, the Committee will begin discussions for creating a process of evaluation of the City Clerk and City Auditor. [text of report]
Report Accepted, Placed on File 8-0

Committee Report #4. The Finance Committee held a public hearing on Aug 7, 2024 to discuss status updates on the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding in Cambridge. [text of report]
Report Accepted, Placed on File 8-0

September 3, 2024

Cambridge InsideOut Episodes 627-628: September 3, 2024

Episode 627 – Cambridge InsideOut: Sept 3, 2024 (Part 1)

This episode was recorded on Sept 3, 2024 at 6:00pm. Topics: Death of Cambridge City Councillor Joan Pickett; Vacancy Recount to be scheduled to elect Cathie Zusy – actual procedure, alternatives, history of Plan E vacancies 1941-present; brutality and disrespect of anonymous commenting; a clearer view of Joan Pickett. Host: Robert Winters [On YouTube] [audio]


Episode 628 – Cambridge InsideOut: Sept 3, 2024 (Part 2)

This episode was recorded on Sept 3, 2024 at 6:30pm. Topics: Shallowness of local press; Councillor Pickett’s actual views on bicycle and pedestrian safety and compromise; Sept 3 Primary; 77 supervoters; lack of candidates, choices; commentary on Decker-MacKay contest; Meet Your Neighbor Day; Boards and Commissions – Volunteer Opportunities – best education money can’t buy; Pre-K startup; $100 tickets for street cleaning; Oldtime Baseball; City Charter commentary; rejuvenation of local news; Central Square zoning. Host: Robert Winters [On YouTube] [audio]

[Materials used in these episodes]

July 2, 2024

Cambridge InsideOut Episodes 623-624: July 2, 2024

Episode 623 – Cambridge InsideOut: July 2, 2024 (Part 1)

This episode was recorded on July 2, 2024 at 6:00pm. Topics: Starlight Square Retrospective: 2020-2024. Host: Robert Winters [On YouTube] [audio]


Episode 624 – Cambridge InsideOut: July 2, 2024 (Part 2)

This episode was recorded on July 2, 2024 at 6:30pm. Topics: Possible future of Starlight Square – floating some ideas; compatibility with housing; creating a Square within the Square; working with abutting property owners for best solutions; the problem of self-appointed spokespersons for people they don’t represent; cyclist fatalities at Mt Auburn/DeWolfe and now at Hampshire/Portland, the problem with intersections and visibility, better solutions needed, hostility and vengefulness by bike lane advocates; noteworthy board appointments; Central Lots Study and future zoning considerations continue – “hurry up and wait”; PILOT agreements; upcoming meetings of interest; accountability of Affordable Housing Trust; Charter Review status – what should happen, keep it simple; DPW gratitude; Cambridge Jazz Festival coming July 27; government role in local news? – reinvention needed, a problem that needs to be solved; a final note on Presidential election prospects. Host: Robert Winters [On YouTube] [audio]

[Materials used in these episodes]

June 23, 2024

Summer in the City – June 24, 2024 Cambridge City Council meeting

Summer in the City – June 24, 2024 Cambridge City Council meeting

This will be the last regular meeting until the Midsummer meeting on August 5. A rally is expected in front of City Hall prior to the meeting in response to the most recent cyclist fatality this past Friday morning.

Cambridge woman killed in bike crash remembered by family for ‘unbreakable spirit’ (Boston Globe, June 23, 2024)
“The woman killed in a bicycle crash in Cambridge last week was identified by her family on Sunday as Minh-Thi Nguyen, a graduate student at MIT.”

“Nguyen’s death came just two weeks after a Florida woman was killed while bicycling in Cambridge. Kim Staley, 55, of Naples, was riding a Bluebike on June 7 when a box truck turned right onto DeWolfe Street from Mt. Auburn Street at about 4:30pm.”

Here’s my first pass at the interesting stuff on the regular agenda:On Vacation

Manager’s Agenda #1. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the appointments of Rayna Jhaveri and Emma Pan as members of the Cambridge Commission for Persons with Disabilities.
Appointments Approved 9-0

Manager’s Agenda #2. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the reappointment of Kathleen Kelly to the Cambridge Water Board.
Appointment Approved 9-0

Manager’s Agenda #3. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the appointment of Tom Stohlman as an Election Commissioner for a term of four years.
Placed on File 9-0


Manager’s Agenda #4. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 24-22, regarding a request for an update on City efforts related to PFAS concerns. (CM24#137) [text of report]
pulled by Nolan; comments by Nolan, DPW Commissioner Kathy Watkins; Placed on File 9-0

Manager’s Agenda #9. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the 2023 Transportation Demand Management Program Report. (CM24#142) [text of report]
pulled by Pickett; comments by Stephanie Groll (CDD), Ryan McKinnon (CDD), Nolan, Iram Farooq (CDD), City Manager Yi-An Huang, Sobrinho-Wheeler, Wilson, Azeem, Toner; Placed on File 9-0

Manager’s Agenda #10. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 24-17, regarding a report on adding maximum lot area per dwelling unit, maximum setback requirements, and minimum floor area ratios in some districts or as part of an overlay in the Zoning Ordinance and whether the City Council could require a special permit for a down conversion in developments that would result in a net loss of housing units. (CM24#143) [text of report]
pulled by Sobrinho-Wheeler; comments by Sobrinho-Wheeler (who advocates prohibiting or requiring a Special Permit for any “down-conversion”, i.e. a conversion of a building to fewer residential units), City Solicitor Megan Bayer; Placed on File 9-0

Manager’s Agenda #11. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 24-27, regarding a list of current zoning initiatives and a timeline for completion. (CM24#144) [text of report]
pulled by Toner; comments by Toner (who wants to put greater focus and shorter timelines for Central Square), Azeem, Pickett, Siddiqui, Iram Farooq (CDD), Simmons, Wilson, Yi-An Huang, Nolan, McGovern; Placed on File 9-0

Manager’s Agenda #12. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 24-29, regarding providing the Request for Information (RFI) for the 84 & 96 Bishop Allen Drive to the City Council for review and comment. (CM24#145) [text of report]
pulled by Sobrinho-Wheeler; comments by Sobrinho-Wheeler, Melissa Peters (CDD), Azeem, Wilson, Yi-An Huang, Iram Farooq, Siddiqui, McGovern, Deputy City Manager Owen O’Riordan; Placed on File 9-0

Manager’s Agenda #13. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 24-28, regarding an outreach plan for Central Square rezoning. (CM24#146) [text of report]
pulled by Wilson; comments by Wilson, Melissa Peters (CDD), Marlees West Owayda (Community Engagement Manager), Simmons, Yi-An Huang, Azeem, Nolan; Referred to Civic Unity Committee 8-0-1 (Sobrinho-Wheeler – Absent)

Manager’s Agenda #14. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to an update from the City Manager. (CM24#147) [text of report]
pulled by Nolan; comments by Nolan, Toner, Yi-An Huang, Siddiqui; Placed on File 9-0


Order #2. The City Manager is directed to provide a plan for keeping residents, businesses and public safety officials informed about the status of current and future inter-jurisdictional transportation projects.   Councillor Pickett, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler (PO24#88)
Order Adopted 9-0

Order #3. City Council commitment to providing high quality health care to all residents and in strong support of H.1239/S.744.   Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Wilson (PO24#89)
pulled by Toner; comments by Sobrinho-Wheeler, Nolan; Order Adopted 8-0-0-1 (Toner – Present)

Order #4. That the City Manager is requested to provide a report to the City Council on the status of PILOT discussions about its PILOT agreement with the City with Harvard at the summer Council meeting and a plan for regular updates going forward.   Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Nolan (PO24#90)
pulled by Toner; comments by Sobrinho-Wheeler, Toner; Order Adopted 8-0-0-1 (Toner – Present)

Order #7. That the City Manager is requested to work with relevant City departments to consider a number of City application processes and find ways to reduce paper and printing waste.   Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler (PO24#93)
Order Adopted 9-0

Order #8. City Council support of the Massachusetts State Ballot Question to Decriminalize Natural Psychedelics For Therapeutic Use.   Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Azeem, Councillor Nolan
pulled by Toner; comments by McGovern, Sobrinho-Wheeler, Toner, Pickett, Wilson; Add Nolan as sponsor 9-0; Order Adopted as Amended 5-0-0-4 (Pickett, Toner, Wilson, Simmons – Present)


Late Order #9. Policy Order regarding Truck and Intersection Safety Improvements.   Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Azeem, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Pickett, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Mayor Simmons
Comments by Sobrinho-Wheeler, Azeem, Siddiqui, Toner, Brooke McKenna (TPT), Owen O’Riordan, City Solicitor Megan Bayer (on Interstate Commerce Clause limitations on regulating trucks), Pickett, Nolan, Yi-An Huang, Wilson, McGovern (on change of culture needed); Add all as sponsors 9-0; Order Adopted as Amended 9-0


Resolution #3. Congratulations to Catherine Woodbury on her retirement from the Department of Public Works.   Councillor Toner

Resolution #31. Appreciation to Catherine Preston Connolly for her dedicated service to the City of Cambridge and its citizens.   Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Pickett, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Wilson

Resolution #34. Gratitude to City Workers at DPW.   Councillor Nolan, Mayor Simmons, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Vice Mayor McGovern

June 4, 2024

Cambridge InsideOut Episodes 619-620: June 4, 2024

Episode 619 – Cambridge InsideOut: June 4, 2024 (Part 1)

This episode was recorded on June 4, 2024 at 6:00pm. Topics: Recycling updates, zero waste plan 2.0, Hazardous Waste Day; FY2025 Budget Adopted – nearly a billion dollars, significant increases over time and especially this year; potential tax implications for fall; reorganization of some City departments – Executive and CDD; sizable 34.3% increase in Mayor’s Office budget; Charter Review status and Gov’t Operations Committee; Planning Board appointments and voracious appetite of some city councillors for behind-the-scenes control or public inquisition; Ronayne Petition v. Supersize proposals. Host: Robert Winters [On YouTube] [audio]


Episode 620 – Cambridge InsideOut: June 4, 2024 (Part 2)

This episode was recorded on June 4, 2024 at 6:30pm. Topics: Ronayne Petition v. Supersize proposals for residential zoning, legalizing multi-family housing; preference for diversity of housing stock rather than supersize everywhere; turning Cambridge into Flushing and rents don’t go down; artificial affordability via subsidy; Central Square zoning discussions and Central Square Lots Study; lunacy of permitting only low-income housing; naive belief that Starlight Square 2.0 would be compatible with high-density housing; Central Square should be more than a social utility – should be a regional draw, need to involve people who currently don’t want to go to Central Square; the perils of onerous Inclusionary Housing requirements; Historical Commission award for our video, the many things we didn’t include in our video; disappearance of the historical role of the wards; need for a history of the Plan E era. Host: Robert Winters [On YouTube] [audio]

[Materials used in these episodes]

June 2, 2024

Blessing of the Big Budget – June 3, 2024 Cambridge City Council meeting

Blessing of the Big Budget – June 3, 2024 Cambridge City Council meeting

Unless the government is overthrown before Monday night, this week’s City Council meeting will have as its central feature the series of votes for approving the FY2025 Budget as well as the major loan authorizations that accompany it. Here are the agenda items I thought significant this week:Fat City Hall

The FY2025 Budget and Loan Authorizations

Committee Report #1. The Finance Committee conducted a public hearing on May 7, 2024, regarding the City budget covering the fiscal period July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. [text of report ]
Nolan notes ignorance of some people re: when Budget comes to a vote, anticipation of more difficult financial decisions in future; Pickett notes that Budget vote will be better advertised in future, concerns about coming tax rates and need to curtail spending, desire to take closer look at capital spending; Wilson has procedural questions and possibility of delaying vote (due to uninformed public comment by one individual); Yi-An Huang expresses concerns about re-opening these matters so late in process; Taha Jennings notes that state law requires budget votes within 45 days of budget submission; Comments by Nolan, Pickett on Public Investment budget; Report Accepted, Placed on File 9-0
General Fund Budget of $939,336,875 Adopted 9-0
Water Fund Budget of $16,247,475 Adopted 9-0
Public Investment Budget of $38,432,720 Adopted 9-0

Committee Report #2. The Finance Committee conducted a public hearing on May 8, 2024, regarding the School Department budget covering the fiscal period July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. [text of report]
Report Accepted, Placed on File 9-0

Committee Report #3. The Finance Committee conducted a public hearing on May 14, 2024, regarding the City budget covering the fiscal period July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025. [text of report]
Report Accepted, Placed on File 9-0

Unfinished Business #2. Transmitting Communication from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the appropriation of the appropriation and authorization to borrow $11,500,000 to provide funds for the reconstruction of various City streets and sidewalks. [Passed to 2nd Reading and Referred to Finance Committee, Apr 29, 2024]
Comments by Nolan; Loan Order Adopted 9-0

Unfinished Business #3. Transmitting Communication from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the appropriation of appropriation and authorization to borrow $4,350,000 to provide funds for the Municipal Facilities Improvement Plan. Funds will support significant building improvements and deferred maintenance projects. Proposed projects include but are not limited to upgrades of Public Works facilities, municipal offices, youth centers, branch libraries and fire stations, renovations to 105 Windsor Street and upgrades of HVAC and electrical systems. [Passed to 2nd Reading and Referred to Finance Committee, Apr 29, 2024]
Loan Order Adopted 9-0

Unfinished Business #4. Transmitting Communication from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the appropriation and authorization to borrow $3,000,000 to provide funds for the design and construction of open spaces at the Peabody School Playground, Corcoran (Raymond Street) Park, Rafferty Park, Wilder-Lee Park, and 359 Broadway. [Passed to 2nd Reading and Referred to Finance Committee, Apr 29, 2024]
Comments by Nolan, Pickett; Loan Order Adopted 9-0

Unfinished Business #5. Transmitting Communication from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the appropriation and authorization to borrow $2,560,000 to provide funds for financing school building upgrades. [Passed to 2nd Reading and Referred to Finance Committee, Apr 29, 2024]
Comments by Pickett, Simmons; Loan Order Adopted 9-0

Unfinished Business #6. Transmitting Communication from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the appropriation of and authorization to borrow $6,550,000 to provide funds for the Ozone Generator Replacement; Water Treatment Plant equipment and systems upgrades and water works construction projects in coordination with DPW street restoration projects, which include Massachusetts Ave 4, Chestnut, Dana, Sciarappa and Winter Streets. [Passed to 2nd Reading and Referred to Finance Committee, Apr 29, 2024]
Loan Order Adopted 9-0

Unfinished Business #7. Transmitting Communication from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the appropriation and authorization to borrow $8,500,000 to provide funds for the sewer Capital Repairs Program and projects related to climate change preparedness efforts. [Passed to 2nd Reading and Referred to Finance Committee, Apr 29, 2024]
Loan Order Adopted 9-0

GENERAL GOVERNMENT FY2024 adopted FY2025 proposed 1 yr % change
City Clerk $1,818,560 $2,162,335 18.9%
City Council $2,649,690 $2,817,000 6.3%
Election Commission $2,408,620 $2,447,755 1.6%
Employee Benefits $28,241,740 $27,111,425 -4.0%
Equity and Inclusion   $2,270,380 new
Executive (*) $8,467,495 $6,845,075 -19.2%
Finance $24,714,165 $26,479,690 7.1%
Human Resources (Personnel) $4,160,630 $5,513,370 32.5%
Law $4,152,645 $4,356,320 4.9%
Mayor $973,255 $1,306,905 34.3%
Public Celebrations $1,621,360 $1,793,575 10.6%
Reserve $40,000 $40,000 0.0%
TOTAL $79,248,160 $83,143,830 4.9%
     
PUBLIC SAFETY FY24 adopted FY25 proposed 1 yr % change
Animal Commission $673,010 $706,165 4.9%
Community Safety $3,036,620 $3,090,825 1.8%
Emergency Communications $10,346,540 $10,930,090 5.6%
Fire $70,461,720 $74,755,005 6.1%
Inspectional Services $5,228,140 $5,544,615 6.1%
License Commission $1,706,185 $2,009,740 17.8%
Police $78,367,440 $80,945,830 3.3%
Police Review & Advisory Board $9,900 $9,900 0.0%
Traffic, Parking & Transportation $16,998,910 $18,077,040 6.3%
TOTAL $186,828,465 $196,069,210 4.9%
     
COMMUNITY MAINT/DEVEL. FY24 adopted FY25 proposed 1 yr % change
Cable T.V. $1,813,725 $1,880,965 3.7%
Capital Building Projects $1,574,415 $1,872,660 18.9%
Community Development (**) $40,890,300 $11,257,750 -72.5%
Conservation Commission
Debt Service $89,585,875 $101,890,280 13.7%
Historical Commission $1,040,215 $1,096,310 5.4%
Housing   $27,834,470 new
Office of Sustainability   $3,143,675 new
Peace Commission $228,225 $237,210 3.9%
Public Works $69,094,590 $73,911,430 7.0%
TOTAL $204,227,345 $223,124,750 9.3%
     
HUMAN RESOURCE/DEVEL. FY24 adopted FY25 proposed 1 yr % change
Commission on Women $345,945 $493,220 42.6%
Human Rights Commission $874,840 $878,550 0.4%
Human Services $59,224,695 $73,251,275 23.7%
Library $18,950,730 $19,391,415 2.3%
Veterans $1,067,600 $1,360,950 27.5%
TOTAL $80,463,810 $95,375,410 18.5%
     
CITY TOTAL $550,767,780 $597,713,200 8.5%
     
EDUCATION FY24 adopted FY25 proposed 1 yr % change
Schools Operating (TOTAL) $245,000,000 $268,250,000 9.5%
     
INTERGOVERNMENTAL FY24 adopted FY25 proposed 1 yr % change
Cambridge Health Alliance $8,316,000 $8,671,170 4.3%
Cherry Sheet Assessments $33,586,010 $33,101,520 -1.4%
MWRA $30,601,130 $31,600,985 3.3%
TOTAL $72,503,140 $73,373,675 1.2%
     
GRAND TOTALS $868,270,920 $939,336,875 8.2%
     
FY24 adopted FY25 proposed 1 yr % change
WATER $15,502,965 $16,247,475 4.8%
PUBLIC INVESTMENT $18,056,905 $38,432,720 112.8%
FY24 adopted FY25 proposed  
Loan Authorizations for Capital Budget $50,000,000 $11,500,000  
  $35,350,000 $4,350,000  
$2,500,000 $3,000,000  
$1,800,000 $2,560,000  
$51,500,000 $6,550,000  
$26,000,000 $8,500,000  
Total Loan Authorizations $167,150,000 $36,460,000  

* 7.7% combined increase for Executive/Equity-Inclusion
** 3.3% combined increase for CDD/Housing/Sustainability

All this should breeze through on either unanimous votes or the typical protest vote from any DSA-affiliates who want to continue beating that old “defund the police” horse. I am far more concerned about the residential tax bills we’ll be seeing in late October when all this has to be funded. Single-, two-, and three-family homeowners may be in for quite a shock based on indications so far.

Unfinished Business #8. Transmitting Communication from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the appropriation and authorization of $15,000,000 to provide additional funds for the construction of improvements at the Fire Station Headquarters Building located at 491 Broadway. [Passed to 2nd Reading May 20, 2024; Eligible for Adoption June 3, 2024]
Appropriation Adopted 9-0


Manager’s Agenda #5. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the appointment of Adam Westbrook and Diego Macias as members and Daniel Anderson and Joy Jackson as associate members of the Planning Board for a term of five-years.
pulled by Nolan (on representativeness of appointees); comments by Yi-An Huang, Iram Farooq; Nolan wants balance on approach to development; Siddiqui wants to know rubric used to select appointees, wants Boston Society of Architects to be involved; Azeem notes charter change, importance of ideology, wants Planning Board to be aligned with City Council; Sobrinho-Wheeler wants data on number of applicants over time and if stipends have affected this, wants to have City Council confirmation process or opportunity to interview applicants prior to appointment; Toner OK with prior process but would prefer to be consulted on applicants prior to appointment; Wilson concerned about diversity of candidates, also wants to be consulted prior to appointments, wants to know how many of the applicants were “persons of color”, when next appointments will occur (three in Aug, Nov 2026); responses by Swathi Joseph re: vetting by Diversity & Inclusion Office; Simmons also wants to know how many of the applicants were “persons of color”; Wilson wants this information in writing; Yi-An Huang describes and defends process, expresses concerns about possible effect of City Council inquisition on willingness of residents to apply; Farooq says 5 of 11 interviewed were “persons of color”; Simmons questions what “persons of color” entails, wants further discussion of Council role in appointments; Appointments Approved 9-0


Making Cambridge More Like Flushing – Or Not

Manager’s Agenda #6. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the Planning Board Report regarding the Ronayne, et al., Zoning Petition. (CM24#115) [text of report]
Referred to Petition 9-0

Committee Report #5. The Housing Committee held a public hearing on May 8, 2024, to discuss allowing multifamily housing in all neighborhoods of the city. [text of report]
Report Accepted, Placed on File 9-0

Committee Report #6. The Housing Committee held a public hearing on May 22, 2024, to continue the May 8, 2024, discussion on allowing multifamily housing in all neighborhoods of the city. [text of report]
Report Accepted, Placed on File 9-0

I attended a recent Ordinance Committee meeting on this petition. It’s actually a pretty good zoning petition, but apparently Mr. Azeem and the ABC crowd will have none of it because it doesn’t go nearly far enough toward making all of Cambridge more like Flushing, NY. I am a graduate of Flushing High School, by the way, and I watched how entire blocks of mixed-scale housing were wiped clean and uniformly replaced by 6-story boxes with near-zero setbacks. This has not stabilized rents there, and it’s a far more hostile place than what I remember. I almost feel as though Flushing has finally followed me to Cambridge – even though it took a while.

Other than the fact that both the Ronayne Petition and the nascent “Azeem-Siddiqui-Cotter-Farooq” petition both call for legalizing multi-family housing in all residential zones, these are two radically different proposals and visions. The former still maintains good neighborhood-scale heights and densities in many residential areas, but the latter would drop all residential zones into a blender and permit the same significantly greater heights and densities across all residential areas of the city. Say what you will but I actually appreciate the current diversity of residential densities and housing types that can currently be found in Cambridge.


Manager’s Agenda #8. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to a request – if necessary – to move to Executive Session to discuss strategy with respect to litigation known as Dalkia Energy Services v. Cambridge, Kendall Green Energy Holdings LLC v. Cambridge, and Southern Energy Kendall v. Cambridge, (Appellate Tax Board Dockets F325664, F325663, F325665, F328941, and all related Appellate Tax Board Docket Numbers for these cases), which are appeals before the Appellate Tax Board.
pulled by Nolan; relates to prior Mgr #7; Solicitor Megan Bayer explains; Executive Session not needed; Placed on File 9-0

Order #3. That the City Manager is requested to clarify why the Wage Theft Enforcement Committee has not yet been appointed and to swiftly appoint the committee as called for in the Wage Theft Ordinance.   Mayor Simmons, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Toner
Order Adopted 9-0


Order #4. That the City Manager is requested to explore the feasibility of delaying the Mass Avenue reconstruction project to minimize its impact upon the busy season for restaurants and other affected businesses, and, should this not be found feasible, a method of providing financial assistance to the impacted businesses to cover the costs of removing their outdoor dining structures, designed to mitigate some of the financial impacts upon them, should be established.   Mayor Simmons, Councillor Toner, Councillor Pickett, Councillor Wilson
pulled by Nolan; Wilson add as sponsor 9-0; Charter Right – Simmons


Central Square Table-Setting

Order #5. That the City Manager is requested to provide a list of current zoning initiatives along with CDD’s recommendations for a timeline for completing each of the zoning initiatives in order for the Council to confirm zoning priorities.   Councillor Pickett, Councillor Toner, Vice Mayor McGovern
pulled by Pickett; comments by Pickett, Toner; Order Adopted 9-0

Order #6. That the City Manager is requested to work with CDD to provide a written outreach plan for engaging the community related to the processes underway in Central Square.   Councillor Pickett, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Mayor Simmons
pulled by Pickett; comments by Pickett, Nolan, Simmons; Order Adopted 9-0

Order #7. That the City Manager is hereby requested to provide the draft Request for Information for the 84 & 96 Bishop Allen Drive to the City Council for review and comment.   Councillor Pickett, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Mayor Simmons
pulled by Pickett; comments by Pickett; Order Adopted 9-0

I have been closely following the current discussions about possible Central Square rezoning and the Central Square Lots Study. Perhaps more than anything, I find the whole paradigm of Central Square advocacy to be rather wrong-headed. Too many people think of Central Square as though it’s a utility meant to provide for much of what the rest of the city would never dream of hosting, e.g. low-income housing and social services. Even the “outreach plans” so far adhere to this flawed paradigm. Historically, Central Square was a major draw for all of Cambridge and greater Boston for shopping and recreation. There are now many people who purposely avoid “Central Scare” due to either real or perceived safety concerns. Nowhere on the list of “target groups” for outreach about Central Square planning did I see any mention of the thousands of people who now avoid Central Square because of these concerns or because Central Square simply doesn’t currently have a whole lot to offer them or their families. My vision of the future Central Square would have a lot of families with children, people of all ages, and ample recreation for everybody.


Order #9. That the City Manager is requested to provide to the City Council a detailed justification for the increased fees for Youth Centers for the 2024-2025 school year.   Mayor Simmons, Councillor Toner, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Nolan (PO24#75)
pulled by Nolan; comments by Nolan, Toner, Sobrinho-Wheeler, Wilson, Simmons, Azeem, Ellen Semonoff, Yi-An Huang; add Wilson, Nolan as sponsors 9-0; Order Adopted as Amended 9-0


Charter Right #1. City Council support of the Act Establishing Protections and Accountability for TNC and DNC Workers (S.627/H1158), which would allow TNCs to sustain worker benefits and protections that maintain a level playing field across transportation industries. [Charter Right – Toner, May 20, 2024]

I have been seeing advertisements on the TV that make it difficult to take a side on this issue. I have no love for the Uber and Lyft companies and I think they should have to play by rules comparable to taxi companies, but I can really sympathize with drivers who like having some independence and choice and who would rather not see themselves as traditional employees of these companies. When was the last time we heard the phrase “gig economy”?


49 Communications – quite tame in comparison to recent weeks. Based on some of the current zoning proposals, Central Square discussions, and more, I suspect the template emails to pick up again soon. – Robert Winters

May 13, 2024

Betwixt & Between the Budget Hearings – May 13, 2024 Cambridge City Council meeting

Betwixt & Between the Budget Hearings – May 13, 2024 Cambridge City Council meeting

May is the month for money meetings. Last week featured the budget hearings for the departments under the categories of General Government & Public Safety (May 7) as well as the School Department Budget (May 8). This Tuesday (May 14) will cover the departments under the categories of Community Maintenance and Development; Human Resources Development; Intergovernmental; & Public Investment.

General Government & Public Safety: (May 7)

City Clerk
City Council
Election Commission
Employee Benefits
Equity and Inclusion
Equity and Inclusion – Diversity    
Equity and Inclusion – DGVPI
Executive – Leadership ✓
Executive – Communications ✓
Executive – Housing Liaison ✓
Executive – Tourism ✓
Finance – Administration ✓
Finance – Auditing
Finance – Assessing ✓
Finance – Budget
Finance – General Services
Finance – Information Technology ✓    
Finance – Purchasing
Finance – Treasury/Revenue    
Human Resources ✓
Law
Mayor’s Office*
Public Celebrations ✓
Reserve
Animal Commission
Community Safety ✓
Emergency Communications
Fire Department ✓
Inspectional Services ✓
License Commission
Police Department ✓
PRAB / Peace Commission ✓
Traffic, Parking & Transportation ✓
Those marked in bold are the ones pulled for discussion. *to appear at May 14 hearing
Community Maintenance and Development; Human Resources Development; Intergovernmental; & Public Investment: (May 14)

Mayor’s Office* ✓
Cambridge Health Alliance ✓    
Cable TV
Capital Building Projects ✓
Community Development ✓
Debt Service
Historical Commission
Housing ✓
Office of Sustainability ✓    
Public Works ✓
Water ✓
Women’s Commission
Human Rights Commission    
Human Services ✓
Library
Veterans’ Services
Cherry Sheet
MWRA
City Overview Section
Financial Summaries Section
Revenue Section
Public Investment Section ✓
Those marked in bold are the ones pulled for discussion. *postponed from May 7 hearing

Monday night’s featured attractions include these:Money

Manager’s Agenda #5. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the appointments of the following persons as members of the Danehy Park Improvement Plan Working Group: Ty Bellitti, Sarina Canelake, Katia Crowley, Anthony Galluccio, Chala Hadimi, Emily Hoffman, Tsion Kebede, Frederico Muchnik, Mike Nakagawa, Natasa Ristivojevic, Antonieta Salguero, Kathleen Riesing, Michael Siegall, Jason Targoff, and David Weylan.
pulled by Nolan; comments by Nolan, McGovern, Toner, Wilson, DPW Commissioner Kathy Watkins, City Manager Yi-An Huang; Placed on File 8-1 (Siddiqui Absent)

Manager’s Agenda #6. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the appointments of Raffi Freeman and Krissandra Robinson as well as the reappointments of Susan Schlesinger, James G. Stockard Jr., and Elaine Thorne as members of the Affordable Housing Trust for a term of three years.
Appointments Approved 8-1 (Siddiqui Absent)

Our Affordable Housing Trust reminds me of New York’s Robert Moses. From Wikipedia: “He created and led numerous semi-autonomous public authorities, through which he controlled millions of dollars in revenue and directly issued bonds to fund new ventures with little outside input or oversight.”

Manager’s Agenda #7. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 24-16, regarding a report on developing ways to fund support of decarbonization and clean energy projects and technical assistance for property owners of all types especially those with limited resources, with an initial focus on work associated with BEUDO emissions reduction requirements.
pulled by Nolan; comments by Nolan, Pickett, Sustainability Czarina Susanne Rasmussen; Placed on File 8-1 (Siddiqui Absent)

One of my greatest concerns about BEUDO (which should really be referred to as BEUDERO (Building Energy Use Disclosure and Emissions Reductions Ordinance) since it’s no longer just about “energy use disclosure”) is the unfunded mandate nature of the whole thing. Even my smaller residential building (triple-decker) will eventually be in the cross-hairs of City officials who would require me to tear out my heating system and gas appliances whether I want to or not. It’s one thing to provide incentives for people to make such changes at the time of eventual building renovations, but I will never warm up to the idea that I shouldn’t have any choice in the matter. This communication at least hints at the possibility of funding and other incentives.

Manager’s Agenda #8. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to a request to move to Executive Session to discuss strategy with respect to litigation known as City of Cambridge et al., v. Lexington Planning Board et al. (Docket No. 2381CV01683), which is an appeal before the Land Court. Additionally, to consider the purchase of real property, O Cambridge/Concord Turnpike in Lexington, Massachusetts, adjacent to the Hobbs Brook Reservoir. Discussing this matter in an open session may have a detrimental effect on the negotiating position of the City.
pulled by Sobrinho-Wheeler; Executive Session (52 minutes); Placed on File 8-1 (Siddiqui Absent)

I believe this concerns this decision of the Lexington Planning Board.

Order #1. That the City Manager is requested to direct the Community Development Department to work with the Co-Chairs of the Housing Committee to turn their vision of multifamily housing citywide into zoning language.   Councillor Azeem, Councillor Siddiqui
pulled by McGovern; comments by Azeem, McGovern, Pickett, Toner, Sobrinho-Wheeler, Nolan (w/amendment), Wilson, Simmons; Order Adopted as Amended on Voice Vote (Siddiqui Absent)

Note: There has not yet been a report from this committee on this topic (though you can watch a recording of the hearing here). Also, in all my years of watching and reporting on City Council meetings have I ever seen an order phrased as “to turn their vision…into…”. There is some pretty serious hubris in having the sponsors of a City Council order refer to their own “vision”. Check your egos at the door please.

By the way, this “vision” is filled with half-truths, falsehoods, and basically comes down to making the standards of height and density associated with the densest parts of eastern Cambridge the standard across all residential districts of the city. This is NOT simply a matter of permitting multi-family housing citywide.

Order #2. That the City Council calls upon the City Manager to take steps to bring support to efforts supporting Overdose Prevention Center legislation currently under consideration in the Massachusetts Senate and House of Representatives.   Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Azeem, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler
pulled by McGovern; comments by McGovern (w/amendment), Nolan, Azeem, Pickett, Wilson, Simmons (in defense of Central Square); Amendments Adopted on Voice Vote; Order Adopted as Amended on Voice Vote (Siddiqui Absent)

It’s one thing to take steps to prevent overdose deaths, but what Mr. McGovern is advocating here will likely help to further define Central Square as a prime destination for substance abusers, and with comes all the additional burdens associated with that degradation (shoplifting, aggressive panhandling, street robberies, drug dealers, people shopping and socializing elsewhere). We should aspire to better things for Central Square and all of Cambridge. – Robert Winters

March 22, 2024

Out Like A Lion – March 25, 2024 Cambridge City Council meeting

Out Like A Lion – March 25, 2024 Cambridge City Council meeting

These are a few of my favorite things….City Hall

Manager’s Agenda #6. Transmitting Communication from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the appropriation of $15,000 to the Grant Fund Public Celebrations (Arts Council) Other Ordinary Maintenance account. The MCC Cultural District Grant provides financial support to state-designated Cultural Districts throughout the Commonwealth.
Order Adopted 9-0

I will simply highlight the last paragraph: “Cambridge’s Central Square Cultural District was one of the 10 inaugural MA Cultural Districts designated by the Legislature in 2012. This funding will support District-based initiatives that drive economic growth and strengthen the distinctive character of the Central Square Cultural District.”

Manager’s Agenda #9. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the Parking Study Executive Summary. [text of report]
pulled by Pickett; comments by Pickett, Nolan, McGovern, Toner (on available parking alternatives), Wilson, Siddiqui, Azeem (wants large grocery stores to be replaced by bodegas – based on notion that the City builds these, wants greater prioritization of bus transportation, wants more subsidized e-bikes), Simmons; comments by Iram Farooq on survey sampling, Yi-An Huang; referred to Transportation & Public Utilities Committee 9-0

As near as I can tell, this “study” consists primarily of survey responses and policy proposals from City staff. I’m not really sure how this qualifies as a “study”. Absent are such seemingly important data as how many on-street parking spaces have been lost and how many more are anticipated to be lost due to current policies (such as the Cycling Safety Ordinance). This seems like a deficiency that ought to be corrected in something billed as a “Parking Study”.

Manager’s Agenda #10. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to the appointment of the following persons as members of the Central Square Advisory Committee for a term of three years; Melissa Greene and Kevin Grinberg.
Appointments Approved 9-0

Welcome aboard, Kevin. It’s also great to see Melissa continuing her role on the Central Square Advisory Committee.

Manager’s Agenda #11. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to Policy Order Number 24-09, regarding a report back with any necessary edits to zoning language that would allow unrelated people to live together in the City of Cambridge. [text of report]
pulled by Siddiqui; Rules Suspended to bring forward Housing Committee Report; Referred to Ordinance Committee & Planning Board 9-0; Communication Placed on File 9-0

Manager’s Agenda #12. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number #24-03, regarding a response on potential public renewable energy projects that could receive funding through the IRA Direct Pay provision. [text of report]
pulled by Sobrinho-Wheeler; comments by Ellen Katz (DPW), Deputy City Manager Owen O’Riordan, Susanne Rasmussen (CDD); comments by Nolan; Rasmussen states that Housing Division (CDD) soon to become separate Housing Department; Pickett on 60% subsidy via Direct Pay; Placed on File 9-0

Manager’s Agenda #13. A communication transmitted from Yi-An Huang, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 24-10, regarding the data analysis included in the Economic Feasibility Analysis provided to EOHLC as part of Cambridge’s MBTA Communities final compliance submission. [text of report]
pulled by Nolan; comments by Iram Farooq, Jeff Roberts (CDD); Nolan notes that the report shows “asking rent” in tables, but actual median rents are significantly lower; Azeem disputes this claiming that median rents are lower only because they include all subsidized rents [actual truth is somewhere in between]; Placed on File 9-0


Charter Right #1. That the City Manager is requested to work with the Law Department and Community Development Department to study whether the City Council could add maximum lot area per dwelling unit, maximum setback requirements, and minimum floor area ratios in some districts or as part of an overlay in the Zoning Ordinance and whether the City Council could require a special permit for a down conversion in developments that would result in a net loss of housing units. [Charter Right – Pickett, Mar 18, 2024]
Councillor Pickett moves to take up both Charter Right #1 and #2; Farooq says she and staff have been consulting Housing Committee Chairs re: their priorities, feels that more study needed to see how expansive this phenomenon actually is; Toner does not object to “down conversions”; Sobrinho-Wheeler OK with restricting “down conversions” claiming this would not be a ban; McGovern prefers to get legal opinion reported directly to Housing Committee; Pickett wants more information about how common this is; Azeem wants income-restricted housing required with any multi-family housing [which likely would result in only subsidized housing developers doing projects]; JSW emphasizes part of Order about setbacks; JSW amendment to refer to Housing Committee Adopted 9-0; Order Adopted as Amended 7-2 (Pickett, Toner – No)

I’ll simply repeat what I said last week: I am very leery of this proposal – especially if it is interpreted to apply to existing buildings. During the days of rent control, the requirement that a “removal permit” was required prior to joining units was routinely used to prevent property owners from doing very reasonable things. For example, when I bought my triple-decker, the apartment where I now live had been operated as a rooming house, and the City treated it as 5 housing units. I had to use my tenure dating back to 1978 in the building to be allowed to legally restore the floor back to the apartment it had been for over fifty years. Had I not been able to do this, it would not have been possible for me to continue owning or living in the building. Many years later, I now occasionally consider the possibility of occupying two floors of the building, and I would be outraged if our elected officials took away my flexibility to do that. The devil, as is often said, is in the details. There is a very creepy mindset in the minds of some elected officials that personal freedom should always take a back seat to their political agendas.

Charter Right #2. That the City Manager is requested to direct the Community Development Department to work with the chairs of the Housing Committee on zoning language that effectively promotes multi-family housing, including inclusionary units, citywide. [Charter Right – Pickett, Mar 18, 2024]
Comments by Pickett, Wilson (with amendment), Toner (will not support Wilson amendment); Sobrinho-Wheeler comments of legalities; Azeem moved to amend Wilson amendment to delete “multiple options for”; comments by Nolan re: middle-income, “workforce” housing; McGovern opposed to conversions to single-family for purpose of sale, suggests that this is only about “having conversations” now; City Manager notes need for prioritization, legal feasibility, questions how many “down conversions” are actually occurring; Toner notes many studies currently underway; Order Adopted as Amended 8-1 (Toner – No)

Again, I’ll simply repeat what I said last week: While I generally agree with the idea of allowing multi-family housing citywide, I really don’t think that this Order should be quoting a class project by a Harvard freshman in making assertions (some of which are demonstrably false) regarding the history of zoning in Cambridge.


On The Table #3. Policy Order to Edit City Council Rule 21A, 21B and add 21C Requiring Two City Councilors to Sponsor Policy Orders and Resolutions to be Filed and Placed on Council Agenda. [Tabled – Mar 18, 2024]
Taken from Table 9-0; Order #1 taken up as well; Toner comments (in response to idiotic and profane testimony of Robert Bledsoe during Public Comment); City Solicitor Megan Bayer notes legal gray area regarding whether profanity may be prohibited – noting that it is not entirely affected by First Amendment, notes history of Mass. Declaration of Rights, John and Samuel Adams when still under British rule, speech about government at that time could be was crude and pushed the limits and that’s the basis of our government today, a future court could say that profanity could be prohibited, essential phrase is “fighting words”, use of profanity directed at an individual could be interpreted as “fighting words”, use of the “F word” in excitement might not be, difficult to make decision in the moment; Toner notes list of potential infractions; Toner proposes to remove prohibition of profanity (though he will vote against removing it); McGovern suggests that this discussion will lead to some people pushing the envelope re: what they can get away with [note: McGovern and others felt no concerns about slander as recently as several months ago]; JSW, Azeem OK with removing prohibition of profanity; Nolan suggests amending to distinguish “requests” and “prohibitions”; Bayer provides additional guidance on “loud and repetitive”; Simmons’ wise comments on “fighting words” and being welcoming, chilling effect of some words and actions, importance of “the rule of the Chair” in conduct of meetings; Placed on File 9-0

On The Table #4. The Government Operations, Rules, and Claims Committee held a public hearing on Feb 15, 2024, which was recessed, and reconvened on Feb 26, 2024. The Call of the meeting was to review and discuss possible amendments to the City Council Rules. At the meeting on Feb 26, 2024, the Committee voted to send 46 rule changes to the full City Council with a favorable recommendation. Please see orders within the report. [Tabled – Mar 18, 2024] [text of report]
Taken from Table 9-0; Report Accepted, Placed on File 9-0

Order #1. City Council Rule Changes.   Councillor Toner
Taken up with On The Table #3; comments by multiple councillors; Councillor Nolan, in particular, notes her intention to allow back-and-forth interaction with public in committee meetings when appropriate (thank you); All Rules Adopted as Amended 9-0

I have no particular issues with the proposed rules changes, but I do find curious the level of vitriol expressed by some people about some of the changes pertaining to Public Comment. In my view, Public Comment has largely devolved into performance by the season ticket holders with the occasional flood of “talking point zombies” generated by organized groups and facilitated by Zoom. My only suggestions are: (a) the Mayor and committee Chairs should have broad discretion in managing public comment and not be bound by overly rigid rules, (b) back-and-forth dialogue between councillors and the public should be encouraged at committee meetings whenever it is helpful, and (c) steps should be taken proactively to address the potential of extraordinary numbers of nonresidents signing up for public comment as part of organized campaigns on controversial issues.


Applications & Petitions #1. A Zoning Petition Has been received from Khalida Griffin-Sheperd et al. regarding Affordable Housing Trust Zoning. (AP24#10) [text of petition]
Referred to Ordinance Committee & Planning Board 9-0

One look at the signers of this petition was enough to convince me that it should be rejected. I also find it curious that the petitioners want to be overly prescriptive in who may serve on their proposed expanded Affordable Housing Trust (AHT). Also, though the idea of using AHT funds to provide rent subsidies seems like a possible alternative to the construction of some of the extraordinarily expensive deed-restricted housing now being funded through the AHT, this proposal seems to simply want to add on this new very high cost for rent vouchers – a potential budget-buster at a time when the City Council really needs to be controlling the Budget much more than they have in recent years. Considering the fact that the AHT is now partially funded out of the City’s Operating Budget, this also raises the question of the legality of such direct rent payments under the Anti-Aid Amendment to the Mass. Constitution.

Order #4. That the City Manager is requested to work with the Law Department, the Community Development Department, and the Traffic, Parking and Transportation Department to determine whether the City could provide incentives for residents who do not have cars.   Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Siddiqui, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan
pulled by Sobrinho-Wheeler to add Nolan as sponsor; JSW comments on incentives to not own car, some concerns about whether this may violate Anti-Aid Amendment; Toner questions why there is a need to incentivize those who have already decided to not own a car, whether BlueBikes subsidies might be in perpetuity; Pickett questions why this is actually an incentive in that it rewards who have already made choice to not own a car [that is, whether this is just a patronage program for a subset of the population]; Nolan says this is not meant to be just for those who don’t currently own a car; Wilson questions need for incentives for those already w/o car and whether this might penalize or shame those who actually need a car]; Siddiqui says intent is not to shame anyone; Azeem quotes an academic paper claiming that every family contributes $14,000 per year to subsidize car ownership, says transit gets better the more people use it [yeah, right], wants to subsidize transit, e-bikes; Simmons asks if the proposes incentive would apply to those who don’t have cars or those who might get cars; JSW says it’s for both, says this is not about shaming; McGovern suggests amending language; Simmons comments on large families, unreliable MBTA, those who work outside Cambridge, those who shop elsewhere, churchgoers, elderly and those with mobility issues – will vote Present; Amendment to add Nolan Adopted 9-0; Order Adopted as Amended 5-3-0-1 (BA,MM,PN,SS,JSW – Yes; JP,PT,AW – No; DS – Present)

There seems to be this belief among some councillors (and some City staff) that the only reason people make personal choices (such as whether or not to own a car) are primarily based on government intervention. I disagree.

Order #5. Support of the Regional Heat Pump Accelerator Program.   Councillor Nolan, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler
Order Adopted 9-0

I will repeat my point of view from last year when BEUDO (or is it BEUDERO?) amendments were being discussed and ordained. Simply dictating mandates is not nearly as effective (or fair) as providing financial incentives. – Robert Winters

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress