Cambridge Civic Journal Forum

Chartering a Course to Nowhere – Featured Items on the June 21, 2021 Cambridge City Council Agenda

As we wend our way to a summer without masks, with more fun, and with (hopefully) less Zoom, we are also fast approaching the day (July 1) when municipal election candidates may pick up nomination papers and start collecting signatures in their quest to represent or misrepresent the citizens of Cambridge. Meanwhile, up at the virtual Sullivan Chamber (could you bozos PLEASE get off Zoom and start meeting in person?) there are these items up for consideration on the summer solstice:

Manager’s Agenda #1. A communication transmitted from Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager, relative to an update on COVID-19 vaccination rollout.
Placed on File 9-0

Communications & Reports #3. A communication was received from Mayor Sumbul Siddiqui, transmitting questions for the COVID-19 Update.
Placed on File 9-0

Unfinished Business #5. Amending City Council Rules for Remote Participation. [ADOPTED IN COUNCIL JUNE 14, 2021; MUST BE ADOPTED AGAIN IN COUNCIL JUNE 21, 2021 PURSUANT OF RULE 36B]
Adopted 9-0

Permitting remote public comment is a good thing, but not if it’s just script-reading orchestrated via social media. As for councillors meeting remotely, if you’re physically able to show up you should show up.

Manager’s Agenda #3. Transmitting Communication from Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager, relative to the appropriation of $1,000,000 from Free Cash, to the Public Investment Fund School Department Extraordinary Expenditures account to conduct a comprehensive review and assessment of our older elementary school buildings in the City.
Order Adopted 8-0-1 (JSW – Absent)

Manager’s Agenda #6. Transmitting Communication from Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager, relative to a request for authorization of a spending limit of $1,900,000 for Fiscal Year 2022, for the Renewable Energy and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reduction revolving fund (Revolving Fund), pursuant to Chapter 3.24 of the Municipal Ordinance titled “Departmental Revolving Funds”.
Order Adopted 9-0

Manager’s Agenda #8. A communication transmitted from Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 20-37, regarding renaming the Central Square Library. [June 21, 2021 Law Department response]
Placed on File 9-0

Essentially, the authority to rename a City library building rests with the Library Board of Trustees appointed by the City Manager and ultimately with the City Manager. The City Council Order has been heard and Library officials and the City Manager will now establish a task force to determine how best to proceed.

Order #4. That the City Manager is requested to work with all appropriate City Departments to issue a second RFP that will work in conjunction with the current RFP, to assess the feasibility of building housing above the Central Square Library, and this RFP should include information on funding possibilities.   Councillor McGovern, Vice Mayor Mallon, Councillor Simmons, Mayor Siddiqui
Adopted as Amended 9-0

This is rapidly turning into a competition for who can propose the largest changes for the Central Square library at the greatest cost. One councillor last week even proposed a 19-story subsidized housing project for the site. Another suggested eliminating the Green Street Garage completely based on the belief that cars will soon be disappearing.

Communications & Reports #1. A communication was received from Mayor Siddiqui and Councillor Simmons transmitting information about the community process for changing the name of Agassiz / Neighborhood 8. [Agassiz neighborhood Council letter]
Accept Report, Placed on File 9-0

Growing up in New York City, all of the public elementary schools and junior high schools had numbers instead of names. They also had names (I think), but nobody used those names and most people didn’t even know those names. It wasn’t until high school that your school had an actual name (like Flushing High School, in my case). Looking back, maybe this wasn’t such a bad system – just like identifying Cambridge neighborhoods by the numbers on that ~1950 map drawn up by Mark Fortune and the Planning Department staff at that time. A rose is a rose is a rose. If the residents in the currently-named Agassiz neighborhood want to make a change, so be it. The name of my Mid-Cambridge neighborhood will likely stand thanks to its lack of reference to any real person. Then again, perhaps Mark Fortune had a friend names Jonathan MidCambridge who hopefully didn’t harbor any dreadful theories.

Manager’s Agenda #10. Transmitting Communication from Louis A. DePasquale, City Manager, relative to the appropriation of $65,019,211, received from the U.S. Department of Treasury through the new Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CLFRF) established by the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), to the Grant Fund Finance Department Other Ordinary Maintenance account which will be used to ……
Charter Right – Zondervan

As the Manager says, “Funds are intended to: • Support urgent COVID-19 response efforts to continue to decrease spread of the virus and bring the pandemic under control; • Replace lost public sector revenue to strengthen support for vital public services and help retain jobs; • Support immediate economic stabilization for households and businesses; and • Address systematic public health and economic challenges that have contributed to the inequal impact of the pandemic on certain populations.”

I’m sure this won’t stop councillors from proposing all sorts of ways to break into this newfound piggy bank.

Unfinished Business #4. Live Acoustic Entertainment Ordinance. [PASSED TO SECOND READING IN COUNCIL JUNE 7, 2021; TO BE ORDAINED ON OR AFTER JUNE 21, 2021]
Ordained as Amended 9-0

This is pretty much guaranteed to be ordained, and that’s probably a good thing – even though no thought whatsoever has been paid to possible unintended consequences.

Order #1. That the City Manager is requested to direct the appropriate City staff to determine the feasibility of establishing a pilot reparations program that would take a to-be-determined percentage of revenue from local cannabis sales and distribute these monies to local Black-owned businesses and to economic empowerment applicants.   Councillor Simmons, Councillor Nolan
Charter Right – Zondervan

I suspect this violates state law, but even if it doesn’t explicitly violate state law it’s still a dreadful road to follow when you begin earmarking revenue based on race.

Order #2. That the City Council go on record in favor of filing of the attached Home Rule Petition entitled: AN ACT AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF CAMBRIDGE TO INCLUDE A BALLOT QUESTION ON THE NOVEMBER 2, 2021 MUNICIPAL BALLOT RELATIVE TO THE HOME RULE CHARTER.   Councillor Nolan, Mayor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Carlone
Charter Right – Toomey

I seriously hope one of the councillors exercises his or her Charter Right to delay this. There were only two extremely-low attendance Zoom meetings on this topic, and the proposal to hand over the authority to approve all appointments to City boards and commissions is nothing more than a power grab guaranteed to politicize all City boards and destroy any possibility of proportionality in the membership of those boards. In short, if five city councillors want to have the Planning Board or any other board be 100% compliant with their point of view (or their endorsing organization’s point of view) they will be able to do so if this proposed change is approved. The other two proposed changes are benign – requiring an annual review of the City Manager’s performance and a review of the Charter every decade (unless 5 city councillor can completely control who participates in the charter review – see above).

Committee Report #1. The Ordinance Committee met on Mar 10, 2021 to continue discussion on the Real Estate Transfer Fee Home Rule Petition.
Accept Report; Placed on File; Order Adopted as Amended 9-0

The endless quest continues to raise more revenue without any regard to potential impacts. I seriously hope there are enough people in the state legislature who have the capacity to assess the cumulative effect of all these proposals, but I’m not so sure that this is the case. – Robert Winters